From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from 13.mo4.mail-out.ovh.net ([178.33.251.8]:46931 "EHLO mo4.mail-out.ovh.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751282Ab3JCIbd (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Oct 2013 04:31:33 -0400 Received: from mail172.ha.ovh.net (b9.ovh.net [213.186.33.59]) by mo4.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 72A94105C959 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 10:24:04 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <524D296B.2090905@overkiz.com> Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 10:23:07 +0200 From: boris brezillon MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fabio Porcedda CC: Wim Van Sebroeck , Nicolas Ferre , Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD , Ludovic Desroches , Yang Wenyou , Grant Likely , Rob Herring , Rob Landley , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] watchdog: at91sam9_wdt: update device tree doc References: <1371799176-3408-1-git-send-email-b.brezillon@overkiz.com> <1371799414-3654-1-git-send-email-b.brezillon@overkiz.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-watchdog-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org Hello Fabio, On 03/10/2013 10:08, Fabio Porcedda wrote: > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Boris BREZILLON > wrote: >> Add new at91sam9 watchdog properties to the documentation. >> >> Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON >> --- >> .../devicetree/bindings/watchdog/atmel-wdt.txt | 30 ++++++++++++++++++-- >> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/atmel-wdt.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/atmel-wdt.txt >> index fcdd48f..e043106 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/atmel-wdt.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/atmel-wdt.txt >> @@ -9,11 +9,37 @@ Required properties: >> >> Optional properties: >> - timeout-sec: contains the watchdog timeout in seconds. > Why are you removing the documentation about this property? I'm not removing the property: this is an enumeration minus not a diff minus. > Regards Regards, Boris