From: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 2 of 3 v2] manual: add section about depending on target and toolchain options
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 13:11:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <524D50D0.8060906@mind.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAXf6LXLV59szv9d-7FJJdGE=cOvvDowTTZGpWep5vyFFxJ2jQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 10/03/13 09:34, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:
> Hi Arnout,
>
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 7:30 AM, Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be> wrote:
>> On 09/25/13 10:56, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:
> [..]
>>> Notes:
>>> - How we will specify the C library is currently marked as 'to be
>>> decided'.
>>> This patch series does not yet unify that, but I plan to do that in a new
>>> patch (or update this series if we can reach a decision shortly). The
>>> problem
>>> is that not all packages that have a dependency on e.g. glibc add a
>>> comment to
>>> show this to the user. A proposal would be to have a comment like:
>>> foo needs a (e)glibc toolchain w/ featA, featB, featC
>>> where the '(e)glibc' string would be left out if there is no constraint on
>>> the
>>> C library.
>>
>>
>> Looks good to me. Though for glibc there is only one feature AFAIK: C++.
>>
>>
>
> I'm not sure what you mean here. I think that some packages depend on
> an (e)glibc toolchain because it requires certain features that are
> lacking in uclibc. I haven't checked for the details though. It may be
> the presence of certain system calls.
(e)glibc always has all features enabled, except for C++ (and RPC in
some cases but I don't think we have those).
Which is fortunate, because it means the additional (e)glibc part isn't
likely to make the line too long.
[snip]
>>> +** Comment string: +dynamic library+
>>
>>
>> For the sake of brevity, maybe "DLL"?
>
> DLL really has a Windows annotation for me. Moreover, it's not so
> commonly used in the Linux world, don't you think?
True. I'm just thinking that this is a pretty long string, that in
addition is likely to be combined with a lot of other things.
The dynamic library support is anyway a bit of a problem, because it
bears little relation to the config option "prefer static libraries".
That part, however, will hopefully be fixed when the other Thomas adds
the choice between static-only, dynamic-only and both.
Regards,
Arnout
--
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-03 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-25 8:56 [Buildroot] [PATCH 0 of 3 v2] Unification of comments on toolchain option dependencies Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-09-25 8:56 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1 of 3 v2] trivial: manual: fix typo formating --> formatting Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-09-25 9:05 ` Samuel Martin
2013-10-06 19:48 ` Peter Korsgaard
2013-09-25 8:56 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2 of 3 v2] manual: add section about depending on target and toolchain options Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-10-03 5:30 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-10-03 7:34 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-10-03 11:11 ` Arnout Vandecappelle [this message]
2013-10-03 11:15 ` Gustavo Zacarias
2013-10-03 11:21 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-25 8:56 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3 of 3 v2] Config.in files: unify comments of toolchain option dependencies Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-10-02 20:08 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 0 of 3 v2] Unification of comments on " Thomas De Schampheleire
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=524D50D0.8060906@mind.be \
--to=arnout@mind.be \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.