From: Tanguy Bouzeloc <tanguy.bouzeloc@efixo.com>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: "linux-mips@linux-mips.org" <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: fix forced successful syscalls
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 16:53:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <524D84EB.8060102@efixo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131002091909.GA23236@linux-mips.org>
On 10/02/2013 11:19 AM, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> To my personal embarassment I have to admit that I knew about this since the
> day the syscall wrapper was written - but was considering it an acceptable
> bug ...
>
> Where it really bits is sigreturn and similar which use the following
> stunt:
>
> /*
> * Don't let your children do this ...
> */
> __asm__ __volatile__(
> "move\t$29, %0\n\t"
> "j\tsyscall_exit"
> :/* no outputs */
> :"r" (®s));
> /* Unreached */
>
> to keep the syscall return path from tampering with the return value.
>
> The scall*.S part of your patch is clearing TIF_NOERROR using a non-atomic
> LW/SW sequence. This needs to be done atomically or the thread's flags
> variable might get corrupted. This is complicated by MIPS I, R5900 and
> afair some older oddball not-quite MIPS II CPUs lacking LL/SC rsp. LLD/SCD.
>
> Ralf
>
I discover the issue when changing the HZ of the kernel to 100HZ, in
this case the jiffies returned to the userland are the same as the
kernel ticks and it'll wrap after 5 minutes of uptime. With kernel HZ at
250 or 1000H it'll make happen the ticks wrap after 230~260j.
Unfortunately programs relying on ticks (they shouldn't but that
happens) have unpredictable behavior for 11.3s before the wrap.
I can update the patch in order to access atomically the thread flags,
the point is ... it'll make the kernel incompatible with old hardware.
Regards,
Tanguy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-03 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-30 14:22 [PATCH] MIPS: fix forced successful syscalls Tanguy Bouzeloc
2013-10-02 9:19 ` Ralf Baechle
2013-10-03 14:53 ` Tanguy Bouzeloc [this message]
2013-10-08 7:42 ` Ralf Baechle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=524D84EB.8060102@efixo.com \
--to=tanguy.bouzeloc@efixo.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.