From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar) Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 11:57:59 -0400 Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] dma: Allow TI_EDMA selectable for ARCH_KEYSTONE In-Reply-To: <20131003150359.GC16684@intel.com> References: <1380580887-24249-1-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> <1380580887-24249-4-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> <20131001015454.GA16684@intel.com> <524ACFAF.7020802@ti.com> <20131003150359.GC16684@intel.com> Message-ID: <524D9407.7090306@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thursday 03 October 2013 11:03 AM, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 09:35:43AM -0400, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >> On Monday 30 September 2013 09:54 PM, Vinod Koul wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 06:41:25PM -0400, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >>>> Allow the TI_EDMA to be built for ARCH_KEYSTONE which also supports >>>> the EDMA IP. >>>> >>>> Cc: Vinod Koul >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar >>>> --- >>>> Vinod, >>>> I need your ack on this patch to carry $subject patch via arm-soc tree >>>> to avoid the unmet dependency warnings. >>> Sure, but too many dependency fixes have been popoing up for this part and this >>> IIRC is third patch! Something doesn't seem right, hopefully am wrong.. >>> >> I think it mainly because EDMA support is just merged last cycle and few SOCs >> which use the EDMA trying to enable them now. > Okay btw is EDMA enabled in any of defconfigs. Having that will help us get > better test covergae in -next > yeah.. I do enable that as part of the series. >> >>> I have a patch in my -next from Josh which selects TI_PRIV_EDMA for this... >>> >> I looked at your next patch which is fixing the TI_EDMA dependency. >> If you prefer to merge $subject patch via your tree, thats fine as well. >> Juts give me a stable branch targeted for 3.13 and I shall merge your branch >> and apply other patches on top of it. > Pls merge my fixes branch. I will send that to Linus in day or two... > Will merge your next to avoid the merge conflict issue. >> Since it was very trivial patch, I thought its easy to carry via arm-soc >> with your ack. > Sure, looks good to me > > Acked-by: Vinod Koul Thanks a lot. Regards, Santosh