From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar)
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 12:06:02 -0400
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] dma: Allow TI_EDMA selectable for ARCH_KEYSTONE
In-Reply-To: <20131003151117.GE16684@intel.com>
References: <1380580887-24249-1-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
 <1380580887-24249-4-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
 <20131001015454.GA16684@intel.com> <524ACFAF.7020802@ti.com>
 <20131003150359.GC16684@intel.com> <524D9407.7090306@ti.com>
 <20131003151117.GE16684@intel.com>
Message-ID: <524D95EA.6090804@ti.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Thursday 03 October 2013 11:11 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 11:57:59AM -0400, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>>>> I looked at your next patch which is fixing the TI_EDMA dependency.
>>>> If you prefer to merge $subject patch via your tree, thats fine as well.
>>>> Juts give me a stable branch targeted for 3.13 and I shall merge your branch
>>>> and apply other patches on top of it.
>>> Pls merge my fixes branch. I will send that to Linus in day or two...
>>>
>> Will merge your next to avoid the merge conflict issue.
> No pls. I usually rebase my -next so I wont advise that. Fixes wont be so pls
> use that and this will be sent to Linus.
> 
opps.. typo ... I mean fixes branch.

Regards,
Santosh