diff for duplicates of <524E9BA9.4000506@arm.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 9f923f9..6574939 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -2,9 +2,8 @@ Hi Grant, On 18/09/13 17:18, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote: > On 18/09/13 15:51, Grant Likely wrote: ->> On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 11:53:03 +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.Karkad= -aNagesha@arm.com> wrote: ->>> From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com> +>> On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 11:53:03 +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org> wrote: +>>> From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org> >>> >>> Hi, >>> @@ -15,22 +14,27 @@ aNagesha@arm.com> wrote: >>> Regards, >>> Sudeep >> ->> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> +>> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org> >> >> However, do you have a user for this function on other architectures >> yet? I'd like to see a user for the function in the same patch series.. >> ->=20 +> > Yes I have posted an RFC[1] following this series implementing cacheinfo > for ARM similar to x86 implementation. I was not sure if it's good idea > to combine it as its still initial RFC version. ->=20 +> -Do you prefer to have this a independent change or to go with the cache top= -ology +Do you prefer to have this a independent change or to go with the cache topology support patches[1] on ARM ? Regards, Sudeep [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/18/340 + + +-- +To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in +the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org +More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index e3274b1..5d4fcbe 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,23 +1,23 @@ "ref\01379501585-12532-1-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com\0" "ref\020130918145116.D53A5C42CDF@trevor.secretlab.ca\0" "ref\05239D26E.5090505@arm.com\0" - "From\0Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com>\0" + "ref\05239D26E.5090505-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org\0" + "From\0Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>\0" "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 0/2] move of_find_next_cache_node to DT core\0" "Date\0Fri, 04 Oct 2013 11:42:49 +0100\0" - "To\0Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com>" - " Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>\0" - "Cc\0devicetree@vger.kernel.org <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>" - Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com> - " linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>\0" + "To\0Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>" + " Grant Likely <grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org>\0" + "Cc\0devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org <devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>" + linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org <linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org> + " Rob Herring <robherring2-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "Hi Grant,\n" "\n" "On 18/09/13 17:18, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:\n" "> On 18/09/13 15:51, Grant Likely wrote:\n" - ">> On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 11:53:03 +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.Karkad=\n" - "aNagesha@arm.com> wrote:\n" - ">>> From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>\n" + ">> On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 11:53:03 +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org> wrote:\n" + ">>> From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>\n" ">>>\n" ">>> Hi,\n" ">>>\n" @@ -28,24 +28,29 @@ ">>> Regards,\n" ">>> Sudeep\n" ">>\n" - ">> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>\n" + ">> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org>\n" ">>\n" ">> However, do you have a user for this function on other architectures\n" ">> yet? I'd like to see a user for the function in the same patch series..\n" ">>\n" - ">=20\n" + "> \n" "> Yes I have posted an RFC[1] following this series implementing cacheinfo\n" "> for ARM similar to x86 implementation. I was not sure if it's good idea\n" "> to combine it as its still initial RFC version.\n" - ">=20\n" + "> \n" "\n" - "Do you prefer to have this a independent change or to go with the cache top=\n" - "ology\n" + "Do you prefer to have this a independent change or to go with the cache topology\n" "support patches[1] on ARM ?\n" "\n" "Regards,\n" "Sudeep\n" "\n" - [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/18/340 + "[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/18/340\n" + "\n" + "\n" + "--\n" + "To unsubscribe from this list: send the line \"unsubscribe devicetree\" in\n" + "the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org\n" + More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -77d88377d98e1bda1b79df47073e420385e0af3ddd783612f2c62653eb9378d7 +9f39aa981f58e0d0b10833cd4c8a44371db6057ce815a47ccab2412cf6bd518e
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.