All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Tauro, Riana" <riana.tauro@intel.com>
To: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>,
	<rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>, <aravind.iddamsetty@linux.intel.com>,
	<mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com>, <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] drm/xe/survivability: Guard runtime survivability enable against unbind
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 11:20:02 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <524ae4f5-d484-4af4-a7ac-68bdaef970c5@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <avP_gtHbb-taK6DK@black.igk.intel.com>


On 11-11-2026 11:09, Raag Jadav wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2026 at 10:13:44AM +0530, Tauro, Riana wrote:
>> On 10-11-2026 18:21, Raag Jadav wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 06, 2026 at 12:49:48PM +0530, Riana Tauro wrote:
>>>> Runtime surivability mode creates sysfs and declares the device as
>>>> wedged in a worker thread. This can race with unbind.
>>>>
>>>> During unbind, devres actions such as disabling the worker run as part of
>>>> teardown. A runtime survivability enable that is still in flight or gets
>>>> scheduled in that window can create the survivability sysfs entries while
>>>> the device is being removed. This is incorrect, as runtime survivability mode
>>>> must not be entered once during devres teardown.
>>>>
>>>> Use the DRM device enter/exit protection so that the enable path
>>>> synchronizes with device unplug and returns early if the device is
>>>> already being unbound.
>>> I'm a bit lost here. Doesn't disable_work_sync() already guarantee this?
>> If the worker is already queued and there is a unbind in progress. The
>> disable work sync from devm
>> action waits for the worker to complete. This causes the device to enter
>> survivability mode during unbind
>> which is not intended.
> Wouldn't the survivability stuff still land on devres and get cleaned
> up anyway?

devres_release_all running as part of unbind copies all the devres nodes 
into a todo list and then
releases them. If during release, we add a new devres that will not be 
cleared during unbind
which can cause stale sysfs.

Riana

>
> Raag

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-11  5:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-06  7:19 [PATCH v4 0/8] Handle non-fatal errors routed via IRQ Riana Tauro
2026-11-06  7:19 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] drm/xe/hw_error: Reuse CSC worker for generic error handling Riana Tauro
2026-11-06  7:19 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] drm/xe/hw_error: Initialize hw_error_work per tile Riana Tauro
2026-11-10  5:48   ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-11-10 12:40   ` Raag Jadav
2026-11-11  4:45     ` Tauro, Riana
2026-11-11  5:40       ` Raag Jadav
2026-11-11  5:51         ` Tauro, Riana
2026-11-06  7:19 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] drm/xe/survivability: Guard runtime survivability enable against unbind Riana Tauro
2026-11-10  6:19   ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-11-10 12:51   ` Raag Jadav
2026-11-11  4:43     ` Tauro, Riana
2026-11-11  5:39       ` Raag Jadav
2026-11-11  5:50         ` Tauro, Riana [this message]
2026-11-11  7:09           ` Raag Jadav
2026-11-11  7:17             ` Tauro, Riana
2026-11-06  7:19 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] drm/xe/ras: Treat non-fatal PCIe errors as recovered Riana Tauro
2026-11-06  7:19 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] drm/xe/pci: Add upstream switch port lookup helper Riana Tauro
2026-11-06  7:19 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] drm/xe/xe_ras: Add a flag for uncorrectable internal error Riana Tauro
2026-11-10 13:07   ` Raag Jadav
2026-11-11  4:47     ` Tauro, Riana
2026-11-06  7:19 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] drm/xe: Add support for wa_14028434957 Riana Tauro
2026-11-10  6:41   ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-11-10 13:18   ` Raag Jadav
2026-11-11  4:50     ` Tauro, Riana
2026-11-11  6:15       ` Raag Jadav
2026-11-11  6:22         ` Tauro, Riana
2026-11-06  7:19 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] drm/xe/xe_ras: Skip double-bit ECC page offlining on AER path Riana Tauro
2026-11-06  7:27 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Handle non-fatal errors routed via IRQ (rev4) Patchwork
2026-11-06  7:29 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-11-06  8:13 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-11-07  7:38 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=524ae4f5-d484-4af4-a7ac-68bdaef970c5@intel.com \
    --to=riana.tauro@intel.com \
    --cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
    --cc=aravind.iddamsetty@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com \
    --cc=raag.jadav@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.