From: Mike <ipso-b1rgQ1Vu1oQlc7lGOYXu6Q@public.gmane.org>
To: linux-bcache-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: bcache-register invoked oom-killer
Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2013 12:36:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52506A38.608@snappymail.ca> (raw)
I seem to be having some major difficulty getting a stable bcache system
setup. I initially started with Kernel v3.11 and quickly ran into data
corruption problems (couldn't even install Ubuntu-server in a VM on the
bcache device), so I upgraded to v3.12rc3 which contained the recent
data corruption bug fix and things seemed to work better.
Cut to the next day after a power failure and all hell has broken loose,
when I booted the machine up fsck fixed a bunch of corruption errors on
the bcache device, but there are constantly new ones popping up after
light usage, such as:
Oct 5 10:56:24 vm3 kernel: [ 88.778956] EXT4-fs error (device dm-0):
ext4_mb_generate_buddy:756: group 10766, 32448 clusters in bitmap, 32768
in gd; block bitmap corrupt.
Oct 5 10:56:24 vm3 kernel: [ 88.778969] Aborting journal on device
dm-0-8.
Oct 5 10:56:24 vm3 kernel: [ 88.780641] EXT4-fs (dm-0): Remounting
filesystem read-only
Oct 5 10:56:24 vm3 kernel: [ 88.780825] EXT4-fs error (device dm-0):
ext4_mb_generate_buddy:756: group 10767, 32448 clusters in bitmap, 32768
in gd; block bitmap corrupt.
<snip a few hundred lines>
Oct 5 10:56:24 vm3 kernel: [ 88.831774] EXT4-fs error (device dm-0):
ext4_mb_generate_buddy:756: group 11001, 8112 clusters in bitmap, 2136
in gd; block bitmap corrupt.
I rebooted into single mode to run fsck a few more times, but upon a
normal boot bcache invoked the oom-killer. Now everytime I reboot I get
a new /dev/bcache? device, I'm up to /dev/bcache3 at this point...
Here is some system information:
- Linux vm3 3.12.0-031200rc3-generic #201309291835 SMP Sun Sep 29
22:37:02 UTC 2013 x86_64
- Memory: 64gb ECC
- The filesystem was formatted with ext4 in largefile4 mode, on top of
LVM, which was on top of BCACHE, which was on top of software RAID1.
# blkid
/dev/bcache3: UUID="TllbXZ-h29v-egAm-xdK9-tWK5-UMPm-aePAUc"
TYPE="LVM2_member"
/dev/sdb1: UUID="F7A0-9938" TYPE="vfat"
/dev/sdc3: UUID="73bfb773-d58d-d44b-c29f-e11574e720a3"
UUID_SUB="1a89bbfc-7a68-a5d9-00d2-dbdeeaf73bdc" LABEL="vm3:1"
TYPE="linux_raid_member"
/dev/sdc2: UUID="0b36e731-d8f2-1ed2-8661-33e118045468"
UUID_SUB="f0d40ed7-17ee-a6d5-a686-3acb205b0609" LABEL="vm3:0"
TYPE="linux_raid_member"
/dev/sdc1: UUID="58aebac9-d829-4c80-8428-15a234da9a88" TYPE="ext2"
/dev/dm-0: UUID="9741d01d-59b2-459a-9df8-a243830e56d9" TYPE="ext4"
/dev/sda1: UUID="7821e9da-144e-4bf6-8700-e9b4a794240a" TYPE="swap"
/dev/sdb2: UUID="0b36e731-d8f2-1ed2-8661-33e118045468"
UUID_SUB="2aadfa93-df66-ef2d-8479-80ea2eb823d2" LABEL="vm3:0"
TYPE="linux_raid_member"
/dev/sdb3: UUID="73bfb773-d58d-d44b-c29f-e11574e720a3"
UUID_SUB="6e0ca23c-04fa-6549-1fc2-fa251459fe31" LABEL="vm3:1"
TYPE="linux_raid_member"
/dev/md0: UUID="8577302d-1f37-40a6-afcd-385beb26059f" TYPE="ext4"
*/dev/sda2 wasn't in the list, but its the bcache cache device.
*/dev/md1 is the bcache backing device.
*/dev/dm-0 is on top of bcache.
The dmesg trace output here:
http://pastebin.com/HidrFAmS
Does this look like a bug or hardware issues?
Thanks.
--
Mike
reply other threads:[~2013-10-05 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52506A38.608@snappymail.ca \
--to=ipso-b1rgq1vu1oqlc7lgoyxu6q@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-bcache-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.