From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 4 Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2013 11:13:09 -0700 Message-ID: <5251A835.9070706@roeck-us.net> References: <20131005224454.GA21581@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.active-venture.com ([67.228.131.205]:56443 "EHLO mail.active-venture.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754080Ab3JFSNP (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Oct 2013 14:13:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20131005224454.GA21581@sirena.org.uk> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Mark Brown , linux-next@vger.kernel.org Cc: Thierry Reding , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Ralf Baechle On 10/05/2013 03:44 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > Hi all, > > Better late than never I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the > master branch of the repository below: > > git://gitorious.org/thierryreding/linux-next.git > > A next-20131004 tag is also provided for convenience. > > Each merge was tested with x86_664 allyesconfig. A few new conflicts > and build test failures came up along the way - these have all been > reported. > Auto-build results: total: 110 pass: 81 skipped: 4 fail: 25 This is worse than with the October 3 tree; reason is that all mips builds now fail. Ralf, any idea what is going on ? Looks like it is caused by a couple of your patches. Please see http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders for details. Guenter