From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] kernel/pid.c: check pid whether be NULL in __change_pid()
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 18:29:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52528CF7.8050405@asianux.com> (raw)
Within __change_pid(), 'new' may be NULL if it comes from detach_pid(),
and 'link->pid' also may be NULL ("link->pid = new"), so theoretically,\
the original 'link->pid' may be NULL, too.
In real world, at least now, all callers which will call detach_pid()
or change_pid() will not cause issue, but still recommend to check it
in __change_pid() to let itself consistency.
After the modification, it passed a simpe test: "build -> boot up ->
[s/g]et_[p/s/g]id() test by LTP tools".
Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
---
kernel/pid.c | 3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/pid.c b/kernel/pid.c
index 9b9a266..15b1b3d 100644
--- a/kernel/pid.c
+++ b/kernel/pid.c
@@ -399,6 +399,9 @@ static void __change_pid(struct task_struct *task, enum pid_type type,
hlist_del_rcu(&link->node);
link->pid = new;
+ if (!pid)
+ return;
+
for (tmp = PIDTYPE_MAX; --tmp >= 0; )
if (!hlist_empty(&pid->tasks[tmp]))
return;
--
1.7.7.6
next reply other threads:[~2013-10-07 10:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-07 10:29 Chen Gang [this message]
2013-10-07 12:43 ` [PATCH] kernel/pid.c: check pid whether be NULL in __change_pid() Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-07 21:53 ` Chen Gang
2013-10-08 17:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-09 1:03 ` Chen Gang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52528CF7.8050405@asianux.com \
--to=gang.chen@asianux.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=serge.hallyn@canonical.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.