From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.66]:16818 "EHLO szxga03-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751746Ab3JHBxR (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Oct 2013 21:53:17 -0400 Message-ID: <52536572.4080308@huawei.com> (sfid-20131008_040150_577261_F6FAD747) Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 09:52:50 +0800 From: Xishi Qiu MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Johannes Berg CC: , Andrew Morton , , LKML , Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: fix some typos in documentations References: <523921BD.3030205@huawei.com> <1380623046.14430.10.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> In-Reply-To: <1380623046.14430.10.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2013/10/1 18:24, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 11:45 +0800, Xishi Qiu wrote: >> >> to ensure the driver cannot be built-in when rfkill is modular. The !RFKILL >> -case allows the driver to be built when rfkill is not configured, which which >> +case allows the driver to be built when rfkill is not configured, which >> case all rfkill API can still be used but will be provided by static inlines >> which compile to almost nothing. > > It looks like this was intended to say "in which" instead of the "which > which" you remove, rather than just "which". > > johannes > Yes, "in which" seems to be better. Thanks, Xishi Qiu