Re: [RFC 0 PATCH 3/3] PVH dom0: construct_dom0 changes

[George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>]

On 10/08/2013 10:57 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 08.10.13 at 11:39, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
>> If it were just a question of cleaning up those bits, I could probably
>> have another draft posted sometime this week.  But if we're stepping
>> back and looking at whether this is the right approach, or whether
>> something like Tim has suggested -- basically making PVH to be HVM minus
>> qemu plus a handful of hypercalls, and most of the changes in the domain
>> builder rather than in Xen -- that will take a bit longer, particularly
>> because it would probably mean me having to understand and modify the
>> Linux side of things as well.  At this point I'm not really sure what
>> the best approach is going forward.
>
> Indeed, this all sounds more like being in need of a discussion on
> the summit then (which however would very likely mean that this
> won't make 4.4).

Hmm, which will make my "PVH technical deep-dive" talk a bit challenging 
to write. :-)

Lars, any suggestions?  I could just back out the talk (which would 
reduce my talk-writing load a bit), or I could try to talk about things 
in general and the issues we've been discussing.

  -George