From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: r.sricharan@ti.com (Sricharan R)
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 17:13:46 +0530
Subject: [PATCH v3 4/6] ARM: mm: Correct virt_to_phys patching for 64
 bit physical addresses
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.03.1310071537040.3023@syhkavp.arg>
References: <1380835081-12129-1-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
 <1380835081-12129-5-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
 <alpine.LFD.2.03.1310031952060.3023@syhkavp.arg> <524E541D.2030509@ti.com>
 <alpine.LFD.2.03.1310040857530.3023@syhkavp.arg> <52530A98.1030708@ti.com>
 <alpine.LFD.2.03.1310071537040.3023@syhkavp.arg>
Message-ID: <5253EFF2.5030600@ti.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Tuesday 08 October 2013 01:12 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Oct 2013, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>
>> Update patch below with your review tag for records.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Santosh
> Micronit:
>
>>  	.data
>>  	.globl	__pv_phys_offset
>>  	.type	__pv_phys_offset, %object
>>  __pv_phys_offset:
>> -	.long	0
>> -	.size	__pv_phys_offset, . - __pv_phys_offset
>> +	.quad	0
>> +
>> +	.data
>> +	.globl	__pv_offset
>> +	.type	__pv_offset, %object
>>  __pv_offset:
>> -	.long	0
>> +	.quad	0
> Please keep the .size statement for __pv_phys_offset, and adding one for 
> __pv_offset wouldn't hurt either.  And the second .data is redundant.
>
Ok, will update this.

Regards,
 Sricharan