From: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, anthony@codemonkey.ws, stefanha@redhat.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, ronniesahlberg@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv5] block/get_block_status: avoid redundant callouts on raw devices
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 14:05:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5253F514.2050101@kamp.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52527015.4090103@redhat.com>
On 07.10.2013 10:25, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 07/10/2013 07:59, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
>> if a raw device like an iscsi target or host device is used
>> the current implementation makes a second call out to get
>> the block status of bs->file.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
>> ---
>> v5: add a generic get_lba_status function in the raw driver which
>> adds the BDRV_BLOCK_RAW flag. bdrv_co_get_block_status will
>> handle the callout to bs->file then.
>>
>> v4: use a flag to detect the raw driver instead of the strncmp
>> hack
>>
>> block.c | 4 ++++
>> block/raw_bsd.c | 3 ++-
>> include/block/block.h | 4 ++++
>> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block.c b/block.c
>> index 93e113a..38a589e 100644
>> --- a/block.c
>> +++ b/block.c
>> @@ -3147,6 +3147,10 @@ static int64_t coroutine_fn bdrv_co_get_block_status(BlockDriverState *bs,
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> + if (ret & BDRV_BLOCK_RAW) {
>> + return bdrv_get_block_status(bs->file, sector_num, nb_sectors, pnum);
> Strictly speaking, this should probably do something like this:
>
> assert(ret & BDRV_BLOCK_OFFSET_VALID);
> return bdrv_get_block_status(bs->file, ret >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS,
> nb_sectors, pnum);
shouldn't the last line be:
return bdrv_get_block_status(bs->file, ret >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS,
*pnum, pnum);
This would of course require *pnum = nb_sectors in raw_co_get_block_status
?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-08 12:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-07 5:59 [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv5] block/get_block_status: avoid redundant callouts on raw devices Peter Lieven
2013-10-07 8:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-10-07 9:25 ` Peter Lieven
2013-10-08 11:13 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-10-08 12:05 ` Peter Lieven [this message]
2013-10-08 12:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5253F514.2050101@kamp.de \
--to=pl@kamp.de \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=ronniesahlberg@gmail.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.