From: "Rob Sterenborg (lists)" <lists@sterenborg.info>
To: Anand Raj Manickam <anandrm@gmail.com>
Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: nat ftp helper bypass
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 15:43:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52540BFC.10109@sterenborg.info> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEyr1FQEDmcb_Gr_7BV0oXN4=Un0+jPJg8rxkoTOG-vE1p3sDQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 10/08/2013 09:42 AM, Anand Raj Manickam wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Rob Sterenborg (lists)
> <lists@sterenborg.info> wrote:
>> On 10/08/2013 07:46 AM, Anand Raj Manickam wrote:
>>>
>>> Is there a way to bypass nat ftp helper for a few connections and
>>> allow the rest of the FTP connections to NAT with the FTP helper
>>> module ?
>>> The need is to NAT the FTP control and data connections without
>>> conntrack-helpers .
>>
>>
>> See man iptables, specifically the raw table:
>>
>> raw:
>> This table is used mainly for configuring exemptions from connection
>> tracking in combination with the NOTRACK target. It registers at the
>> netfilter hooks with higher priority and is thus called before ip_conntrack,
>> or any other IP tables. It provides the following built-in chains:
>> PREROUTING (for packets arriving via any network interface) OUTPUT (for
>> packets generated by local processes)
>>
>>
>> --
>> Rob
>>
> Thanks for your response Rob.
>
> The setup is a router and I m tryin to SNAT so the choice i have is on
> FORWARD / POSTROUTING chain.
> I need connection tracking as i need to NAT the traffic without the
> nat ftp helper module .
Look at these pages:
http://doc.powerdns.com/html/recursor-performance.html
http://www.stearns.org/pomlist/20030101-output/pom-userspace.html#raw
I've never had to use the raw table nor the NOTRACK target so my info is
likely hardly authoritative. But, I guess it would work something like this:
$ipt -t raw -A PREROUTING -d <ip_ftp_server> -p tcp -m multiport \
--dports 20,21 -j NOTRACK
$ipt -t raw -A PREROUTING -s <ip_ftp_server> -p tcp -m multiport \
--dports 20,21 -j NOTRACK
If I understand things correctly, this should make connections to/from
the specified FTP server untracked.
After that, you'd need static NAT rules to forward packets to and from
the FTP server. I don't know if Netfilter does NAT without connection
tracking. If not, then maybe iproute2 can help you there:
http://linux-ip.net/html/nat-stateless.html
--
Rob
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-08 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-08 5:46 nat ftp helper bypass Anand Raj Manickam
2013-10-08 7:36 ` Rob Sterenborg (lists)
2013-10-08 7:42 ` Anand Raj Manickam
2013-10-08 8:17 ` Tom van Leeuwen
2013-10-08 8:34 ` Anand Raj Manickam
2013-10-08 13:43 ` Rob Sterenborg (lists) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52540BFC.10109@sterenborg.info \
--to=lists@sterenborg.info \
--cc=anandrm@gmail.com \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.