From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx12.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.17]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r9AF4TEu021377 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:04:29 -0400 Received: from tx2outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (tx2ehsobe003.messaging.microsoft.com [65.55.88.13]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r9AF4Rl1007374 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:04:28 -0400 Message-ID: <5256C1EA.8080805@tekcomms.com> Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 10:04:10 -0500 From: Joe Harvell MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5255CAB1.5050606@tekcomms.com> <1381356552.67129.YahooMailNeo@web181504.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <5255D815.1090704@tekcomms.com> <1381361455.80237.YahooMailNeo@web181502.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1381361455.80237.YahooMailNeo@web181502.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] pvs complains of missing PVs that are not missing Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed" To: linux-lvm@redhat.com Cc: matthew patton Le 09/10/2013 18:30, matthew patton a =EF=BF=BDcrit : >> So I should set 'obtain_device_list_from_udev' to 0, then pvscan, vgscan >> and lvscan? > > worth a shot. have you confirmed that udev has all the basic disk devices= created? > I tried that to no avail. Yes, all the block devices were present in=20 /dev, both for the raw partitions and the RAID ones. Does anyone know the algorithm LVM uses to determine whether PVs are=20 present? Also, I'd really like an LVM tool that reads the PV label off=20 of a PV and displays it...I want to see what UUID label is actually on=20 each PV.