From: Arvid Brodin <arvid.brodin@xdin.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] Got u-boot-2012.10 running on at91rm9200 - but why does it work?
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 17:30:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5256C82A.2020708@xdin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52566484.4040008@bus-elektronik.de>
On 2013-10-10 10:25, Jens Scharsig wrote:
> Hello Arvid,
> Am 2013-10-09 21:23, schrieb Arvid Brodin:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I managed to get u-boot-2012.10 to boot from NOR flash on a custom
>> at91rm9200 board by doing this:
>>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arvid Brodin <arvid.brodin@xdin.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/start.S | 8 +++-----
>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/start.S b/arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/start.S
>> index 14c9156..efc4ea3 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/start.S
>> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/start.S
>> @@ -294,9 +294,7 @@ clbss_e:
>> _nand_boot_ofs:
>> .word nand_boot
>> #else
>> - ldr r0, _board_init_r_ofs
>> - adr r1, _start
>> - add lr, r0, r1
>> + ldr lr, _board_init_r
>> add lr, lr, r9
>> /* setup parameters for board_init_r */
>> mov r0, r5 /* gd_t */
>> @@ -304,8 +302,8 @@ _nand_boot_ofs:
>> /* jump to it ... */
>> mov pc, lr
>>
>> -_board_init_r_ofs:
>> - .word board_init_r - _start
>> +_board_init_r:
>> + .word board_init_r
>> #endif
>>
>> _rel_dyn_start_ofs:
>>
>
> you don't need change start.s to boot from NOR.
> If shold set the #define CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE 0x00000000
But that's just the thing, I *do* need this change for the board to boot.
CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE is 0x10000000 (this is the base address for the flash
memory).
Without my patch above, I only get this:
----------
U-Boot 2012.10 (Oct 09 2013 - 02:28:44)
DRAM: 64 MiB
----------
I thought this was a known problem with at91rm9200 booting from NOR flash?
There's at least one other board that I know of with the same problem (the
Artila Matrix-500).
> Please see the configuration for eb_cpux9k2 board. This board does boot
> from NOR with u-boot 2012.10.
Hmm, you are right. This config does boot my card (after I modify it to suit,
of course). Besides the different CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE, I think the main
differences to the at91rm9200ek config that I based my earlier config on are
these things:
#define CONFIG_SYS_BOOT_SIZE 0x00 /* 0 KBytes */
#define CONFIG_SYS_U_BOOT_BASE PHYS_FLASH_1
#define CONFIG_SYS_U_BOOT_SIZE 0x60000 /* 384 KBytes */
None of these are declared in the at91rm9200ek config.
Unfortunately, I don't have an AT91RM9200EK card, so I can't test if the
problem I ran in to exists for that card as well using the at91rm9200ek
config.
--
Arvid Brodin | Consultant (Linux)
XDIN AB | Knarrarn?sgatan 7 | SE-164 40 Kista | Sweden | xdin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-10 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-09 19:23 [U-Boot] Got u-boot-2012.10 running on at91sam9200 - but why does it work? Arvid Brodin
2013-10-10 8:25 ` Jens Scharsig
2013-10-10 15:30 ` Arvid Brodin [this message]
2013-10-11 6:28 ` [U-Boot] Got u-boot-2012.10 running on at91rm9200 " Jens Scharsig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5256C82A.2020708@xdin.com \
--to=arvid.brodin@xdin.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.