From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joel Fernandes Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 02/15] ARM: OMAP2+: AM33XX: add lateinit hook for calling pm late init Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 10:53:32 -0500 Message-ID: <5256CD7C.5080909@ti.com> References: <1381354144-7134-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> <1381361098-8283-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> <52563BD8.1060703@ti.com> <20131010133209.GA13105@kahuna> <5256C5D2.9030302@ti.com> <5256C686.6000301@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Nishanth Menon Cc: dt list , Paul Walmsley , Kevin Hilman , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , Tony Lindgren , lkml , Tero Kristo , Kevin Hilman , Benoit Cousson , linux-omap , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On 10/10/2013 10:45 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Joel Fernandes wrote: >> I see a function of that name already exists. I guess you can leave your patch >> as is then and not have to do this. > > > Can I consider that as an Acked-by :) ? Yes, sure, for this particular patch: Acked-by: Joel Fernandes thanks, -Joel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: joelf@ti.com (Joel Fernandes) Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 10:53:32 -0500 Subject: [PATCH V6 02/15] ARM: OMAP2+: AM33XX: add lateinit hook for calling pm late init In-Reply-To: References: <1381354144-7134-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> <1381361098-8283-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> <52563BD8.1060703@ti.com> <20131010133209.GA13105@kahuna> <5256C5D2.9030302@ti.com> <5256C686.6000301@ti.com> Message-ID: <5256CD7C.5080909@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 10/10/2013 10:45 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Joel Fernandes wrote: >> I see a function of that name already exists. I guess you can leave your patch >> as is then and not have to do this. > > > Can I consider that as an Acked-by :) ? Yes, sure, for this particular patch: Acked-by: Joel Fernandes thanks, -Joel