From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from db9outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (mail-db9lp0249.outbound.messaging.microsoft.com [213.199.154.249]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 426A8E0163D for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 09:17:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail127-db9-R.bigfish.com (10.174.16.240) by DB9EHSOBE004.bigfish.com (10.174.14.67) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.22; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 16:17:25 +0000 Received: from mail127-db9 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail127-db9-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E530E6022F; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 16:17:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:70.37.183.190; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:mail.freescale.net; RD:none; EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -6 X-BigFish: VS-6(zzbb2dI98dI9371I1dbaI1432I4015Izz1f42h208ch1ee6h1de0h1fdah2073h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1fc6hzz177df4h17326ah1de097h186068h8275bhz2dh2a8h839h93fhd25he5bhf0ah1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h1765h18e1h190ch1946h19b4h19c3h1ad9h1b0ah1b2fh1fb3h1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1dfeh1dffh1f5fh1fe8h1ff5h209eh1155h) Received: from mail127-db9 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail127-db9 (MessageSwitch) id 1381421843358386_16973; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 16:17:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from DB9EHSMHS016.bigfish.com (unknown [10.174.16.253]) by mail127-db9.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5276E3C007A; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 16:17:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.freescale.net (70.37.183.190) by DB9EHSMHS016.bigfish.com (10.174.14.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.227.3; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 16:17:22 +0000 Received: from tx30smr01.am.freescale.net (10.81.153.31) by 039-SN1MMR1-003.039d.mgd.msft.net (10.84.1.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.2; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 16:17:21 +0000 Received: from [10.29.244.63] ([10.29.244.63]) by tx30smr01.am.freescale.net (8.14.3/8.14.0) with ESMTP id r9AGHGP0022465; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 09:17:19 -0700 Message-ID: <5256D1E6.5040202@freescale.com> Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 13:12:22 -0300 From: Daiane Angolini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eric Nelson , Daiane Angolini , "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" , Otavio Salvador References: <52560A12.1010401@boundarydevices.com> <5256A1E3.5070002@freescale.com> <5256B901.9010706@boundarydevices.com> In-Reply-To: <5256B901.9010706@boundarydevices.com> X-OriginatorOrg: freescale.com X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn% Subject: Re: [RFC] default u-boot X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 16:17:28 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/10/2013 11:26 AM, Eric Nelson wrote: > Hi Daiane, > > On 10/10/2013 05:47 AM, Daiane Angolini wrote: >> On 10/09/2013 10:59 PM, Eric Nelson wrote: >>> On 10/09/2013 05:28 PM, Daiane Angolini wrote: > >> > >> > >> >>>> Is the default version for nitrogen and sabrelite (u-boot-boundary) >>>> 2013.01? >>>> >>> No. The current release of u-boot-boundary is 2013.07: >>> http://boundarydevices.com/u-boot-2013-07-release/ >> >> Thanks, I changed the docs already. >> >>> >>> The sources are in our Github repository (production branch is >>> what we're currently shipping with boards); >>> https://github.com/boundarydevices/u-boot-imx6/tree/production >>> >>> We try to keep this in-line with true main-line U-Boot, but use >>> it as a staging area so we can be a bit more responsive to customer >>> needs. The primary deltas at this point are additional boards >>> (nit6xlite is not yet in main-line), support for additional >>> displays, and support for custom boards. >> >> I used your last sentence to make a description. Please, take a look on >> https://github.com/Freescale/Documentation/blob/master/release-notes/source/u-boot.rst >> >> >> And let me know if you want to change anything. >> > > This looks good. Thanks. > >>> >>>> I would like to know what's the plan to add both support on u-boot-fslc >>>> >>> I have to admit that I've never looked at u-boot-fslc. I thought it was >>> only used for PPC boards. >> >> u-boot-fslc is our recipe that points to "trye main-line U-Boot". It's >> hosted on github only to keep some needed backport patches. >> > > IOW, the same thing we use ours for. If it makes things easier, we could > push a 'boundary' branch there when we update things. <3 I think it would be perfect =D (if not for Dora, absolutely for 1.6) Otavio, what do you think? Daiane