From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57694E01653 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:46:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Oct 2013 18:42:42 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,1076,1371106800"; d="scan'208";a="391368953" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.15.234]) ([10.255.15.234]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Oct 2013 18:45:56 -0700 Message-ID: <52575854.6080302@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:45:56 -0700 From: Saul Wold User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130923 Thunderbird/17.0.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Osier-Mixon References: <52571E27.70308@gna.org> <52572994.4050006@gna.org> In-Reply-To: Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" , Otavio Salvador Subject: Re: Yocto Project 1.5_M5.rc6 X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 01:46:05 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sorry for the top post here. The real reason we still have Qt3 is because it's required part of the LSB spec. OE-Core contains Qt4 and we know that meta-qt5 exists from Otavio and Martin. I know that Richard and Paul have been watching what's going on with meta-qt5. Sau! On 10/10/2013 05:31 PM, Jeff Osier-Mixon wrote: > Game, set, and match! This is also why I don't play golf! > > There are many layers I would love to see in the YP QA process and I > would count meta-qt5 in the top priority. However, we only have so > many resources, so we have to focus on the core right now. I'd be > happy to talk offline about finding ways to locate new resources. > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Otavio Salvador > wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Christian Gagneraud wrote: >>> On 11/10/13 11:02, Jeff Osier-Mixon wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Chris - well-intended sarcasm isn't usually a problem, but I want >>>> to make sure to address your concerns here. We would like to see a >>>> meta-qt5 as well but so far one has not been submitted. If you would >>>> like to submit one, I would be happy to put you in touch with the >>>> right maintainers who can guide you through the process. >>> >>> >>> Hi Jeff, >>> >>> Well-intended answer! ;) But i want to make sure to address your concerns >>> here. I would like to see the meta-qt5 [1] in Yocto's QA process. If you >>> would like to integrate it, I would be happy to put you in touch with the >>> right maintainers who can guide you through the process. >>> >>> Chris. >>> >>> [1] https://github.com/meta-qt5 >> >> Hey, this was even easier. >> >> I am one of meta-qt5 maintainers and I am sure Martin will be more >> than happy to get it into the QA process. Jeff ... this was easy :-) >> >> -- >> Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems >> http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br >> Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 > > >