From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chanwoo Choi Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] extcon: palmas: Added a new compatible type *ti,palmas-usb-vid* Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 16:06:21 +0900 Message-ID: <5257A36D.80902@samsung.com> References: <1381408647-24653-1-git-send-email-kishon@ti.com> <5256A773.6060807@nvidia.com> <5257977C.1030108@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <5257977C.1030108@ti.com> Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I Cc: Laxman Dewangan , "rob.herring@calxeda.com" , "pawel.moll@arm.com" , "mark.rutland@arm.com" , "swarren@wwwdotorg.org" , "ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk" , "rob@landley.net" , "myungjoo.ham@samsung.com" , "gg@slimlogic.co.uk" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Stephen Warren List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 10/11/2013 03:15 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > On Thursday 10 October 2013 06:41 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote: >> On Thursday 10 October 2013 06:07 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >>> The Palmas device contains only a USB VBUS-ID detector, so added a >>> compatible type *ti,palmas-usb-vid*. Didn't remove the existing compatible >>> types for backward compatibility. >>> >> I dont have much issue on this nomenclature but just second thought: >> >> The Palmas USB module is capable of detection VBUS, ID-GND, ID-RA, ID-RB, ID-RC >> and ID-FLOAT as per BC1.2. >> This sub-module only detect the cable, does nothing more than this. >> In this case, should we say "ti,palmas-usb-extcon"? >> Again extcon is linux specific terminology and this can be defer. > > I don't mind either way. Chanwoo? The EXTCON is subsystem name. I don't prefer to use 'extcon' word on device name. I agree Kishon opinion.