From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx-3.enea.com (sestofw01.enea.se [192.36.1.252]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 067E6E01566 for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 01:10:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.16.140.23] (172.16.140.23) by smtp.enea.com (172.21.1.209) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.318.1; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 10:10:00 +0200 Message-ID: <5257B256.7070705@enea.com> Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 10:09:58 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?RGF2aWQgTnlzdHLDtm0=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Ashfield References: <20131004163952.GA5669@longhaul.twobit.us> <524EF9AE.7090201@twobit.us> <52551E5A.4000204@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP: [172.16.140.23] Cc: "meta-virtualization@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Explicitly set CHECKPOLICY path to native sysroot. X-BeenThere: meta-virtualization@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of layer enabling hypervisor, virtualization tool stack, and cloud support" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 08:10:08 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri 11 Oct 2013 05:21:37 AM CEST, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 5:14 AM, David Nystr=C3=B6m wrote: >> On 10/04/2013 07:23 PM, Philip Tricca wrote: >>> >>> Probably should add that I'm not very fond of having the path hard code= d >>> like this. Makes for a dependency on the install location from the >>> checkpolicy recipe. For the short term this fixes the immediate issue >>> though. Feedback on the "right way" to reference / find this binary >>> would be appreciated. >>> >>> Regards, >>> - Philip >> >> >> I suppose the correct way would be to patch the configure scripts and >> upstream that patch to Xen. But I have no problems with this, as long as >> chkconfig referenced from native sysroot is in DEPENDS, to avoid build r= ace >> conditions. > > Which isn't the case at the moment.So this patch needs a bit more work. I guess its true what they say, "noone can hear you be subtle on the=20 internet" :) > Philip: Are you talking about the selinux checkpolicy here ? I assume you= are, > but want to be sure. If you are, not only do we need the package in the > DEPENDS, we need meta-selinux in the README's layer dependency list for > meta-virt. If so , we should make this dependency optional if selinux is in=20 DISTRO_FEATURES. > > Bruce > >> >> Br, >> David >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> meta-virtualization mailing list >> meta-virtualization@yoctoproject.org >> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-virtualization > > >