From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: walter harms Subject: Re: Odp: Re: patch INP3 for kernel 3.6 Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 13:05:31 +0200 Message-ID: <5257DB7B.8040402@bfs.de> References: <5243ee588b32f4.42875689@wp.pl> Reply-To: wharms@bfs.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5243ee588b32f4.42875689@wp.pl> Sender: linux-hams-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: Waldek Cc: linux-hams Am 26.09.2013 10:20, schrieb Waldek: > Ok I have try compile kernel 3.6 with fixed rejected netrom.h and pat= ch don't working with 3.6 kernel >=20 > CC [M] net/netrom/af_netrom.o > In file included from net/netrom/af_netrom.c:40:0: > include/net/netrom.h:72:27: warning: declaration does not declare any= thing [enabled by default] > net/netrom/af_netrom.c: In function 'nr_ioctl': > net/netrom/af_netrom.c:1261:3: error: implicit declaration of functio= n 'inp3_set_mnem' [-Werror=3Dimplicit-function-declaration] > net/netrom/af_netrom.c:1269:3: error: implicit declaration of functio= n 'inp3_get_mnem' [-Werror=3Dimplicit-function-declaration] > net/netrom/af_netrom.c: In function 'nr_proto_init': > net/netrom/af_netrom.c:1481:2: error: implicit declaration of functio= n 'kinp3d_start' [-Werror=3Dimplicit-function-declaration] > net/netrom/af_netrom.c: In function 'nr_exit': > net/netrom/af_netrom.c:1512:2: error: implicit declaration of functio= n 'kinp3d_stop' [-Werror=3Dimplicit-function-declaration] > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > make[2]: *** [net/netrom/af_netrom.o] error 1 > make[1]: *** [net/netrom] error 2 > make: *** [net] error 2 >=20 >=20 do not worry, he is missing the function declaration (inp3_set_mnem,kinp3d_start) onl= y, create them an this problem is fixed. Normaly this is only a warning bu= t "some warnings being treated as errors" re, wh > Dnia Czwartek, 26 Wrze=B6nia 2013 10:10 Matt Maguire napisa=B3(a)=20 >> I'm not surprised it doesn't apply cleanly -- it is for 2.6 kernel, >> not 3.6. Even if it did apply, I wouldn't use it until the deadlock >> issue is addressed -- that's why I was interested to hear that someo= ne >> else made a patch for 2.6, as I am curious whether they also fixed t= he >> deadlock issue inherited from the 2.4 patch. >=20 >=20 >=20 > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams"= in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html