From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from co1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (co1ehsobe002.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.180.185]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C31DE01610 for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 04:32:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail111-co1-R.bigfish.com (10.243.78.246) by CO1EHSOBE016.bigfish.com (10.243.66.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.22; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 11:32:49 +0000 Received: from mail111-co1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail111-co1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 962FE5C0238; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 11:32:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:70.37.183.190; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:mail.freescale.net; RD:none; EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -4 X-BigFish: VS-4(zzbb2dI98dI9371I1432Izz1f42h208ch1ee6h1de0h1fdah2073h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1fc6hzz1de098h177df4h17326ah1de097h186068h8275bhz2dh2a8h839h93fhd25he5bhf0ah1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h1765h18e1h190ch1946h19b4h19c3h1ad9h1b0ah1b2fh1fb3h1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1dfeh1dffh1f5fh1fe8h1ff5h209eh1155h) Received: from mail111-co1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail111-co1 (MessageSwitch) id 1381491152407980_11002; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 11:32:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from CO1EHSMHS019.bigfish.com (unknown [10.243.78.227]) by mail111-co1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55EA04C018A; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 11:32:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.freescale.net (70.37.183.190) by CO1EHSMHS019.bigfish.com (10.243.66.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.227.3; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 11:32:32 +0000 Received: from tx30smr01.am.freescale.net (10.81.153.31) by 039-SN1MMR1-002.039d.mgd.msft.net (10.84.1.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.2; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 11:32:30 +0000 Received: from [10.29.244.63] ([10.29.244.63]) by tx30smr01.am.freescale.net (8.14.3/8.14.0) with ESMTP id r9BBWSg5013116; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 04:32:28 -0700 Message-ID: <5257E0A4.5010607@freescale.com> Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 08:27:32 -0300 From: Daiane Angolini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eric Nelson , Otavio Salvador References: <52560A12.1010401@boundarydevices.com> <5256A1E3.5070002@freescale.com> <5256B901.9010706@boundarydevices.com> <5256D1E6.5040202@freescale.com> <5256D665.1020702@boundarydevices.com> <5256FBB9.9040300@boundarydevices.com> <5256FBC2.4090401@freescale.com> <52570169.9010808@boundarydevices.com> In-Reply-To: <52570169.9010808@boundarydevices.com> X-OriginatorOrg: freescale.com X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn% Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [RFC] default u-boot X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 11:32:54 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/10/2013 04:35 PM, Eric Nelson wrote: > Hi Daiane, > > On 10/10/2013 12:10 PM, Daiane Angolini wrote: >> On 10/10/2013 04:10 PM, Eric Nelson wrote: >>> Hi Otavio, >>> >>> On 10/10/2013 10:44 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>>> Hello Eric, >>>> >>>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Eric Nelson >>>> wrote: >>>>> On 10/10/2013 09:28 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>>>>> It seems the best would be if, instead of pushing to our u-boot GIT, >>>>>> it had regular updates in the u-boot-boundary recipes and point to >>>>>> newer revisions. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> We'll make sure to update with each switch in our production branch. >>>> >>>> Great; this is the way to go. >>>> >>>> Could you please update the current SRCREV and PV values to match the >>>> current state? >>>> >>> >>> This is essentially done... meta-fsl-arm-extra is only one patch behind >>> (a custom board). >>> >>> We're expecting to issue our next release after 2013.10 is finalized. >> >> is this targeting Dora as well? >> > > U-Boot doesn't really have much of a relationship with any particular > userspace. I'm sorry. I think I made you misunderstand my request. I have a release notes to write. and I need to write the right version on documentation. If you plan to change the u-boot version for dora at some point, I prefer to write the changed version on documents right now, or leave me a note someplace for pay attention on this u-boot provider later and change the docs in-time. If there is no plan to change the u-boot-boundary version for Dora, I will consider u-boot.rst done for review only. =D > > We use the same version to boot Android, WEC7, QNX and other O/S's. > > That said, we're completely focused on Dora. As far as we can tell, > it's in much better shape on i.MX6 than Dylan. > > We will address a couple of quirks in loading DT-kernels in the > next release. Notably, you currently need to set 'fdt_addr' and > 'fdt_high' before using 3.5.7 or 3.10.9: > > http://boundarydevices.com/i-mx6-3-5-7-alpha-release/#comment-63691 > > Regards, > > > Eric > Regards, -- Daiane