From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Erasure Coding and Homomorphism Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 17:15:17 +0200 Message-ID: <52581605.7010207@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="p5gmx7GM3UliMmVxuTlk4uxCfNXMqAVbE" Return-path: Received: from smtp.dmail.dachary.org ([91.121.254.229]:60715 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753834Ab3JKPPU (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Oct 2013 11:15:20 -0400 Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: "James S. Plank" Cc: Ceph Development , Francois Helt This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --p5gmx7GM3UliMmVxuTlk4uxCfNXMqAVbE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi James, Please meet Fran=E7ois Helt who is best know for his work on image proces= sing in the movie industry. It has been suggested that there may be inter= esting intersections between "Homomorphism" and Erasure Coding. Do you ha= ve an opinion on this topic ? It is entirely possible that my question do= es not make any sense :-) Hopefully Fran=E7ois will be able to expand in = a sensible way. Cheers P.S. I cc' the public mailing list ceph-devel in the hope that people are= willing to participate in this thread.=20 --=20 Lo=EFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good people do noth= ing. --p5gmx7GM3UliMmVxuTlk4uxCfNXMqAVbE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlJYFgUACgkQ8dLMyEl6F23nTwCbBAgbwcv4Yo+tyUzTsQojrNjN dHMAn3vLc0ms7rhaevf3d94OhaGNmjjL =BDGp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --p5gmx7GM3UliMmVxuTlk4uxCfNXMqAVbE--