Re: Problem with image types

[Daiane Angolini <daiane.angolini@freescale.com>]

On 10/11/2013 01:18 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 2013-10-11 10:13, Eric Bénard wrote:
>> Le Fri, 11 Oct 2013 09:37:48 -0600,
>> Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com> a écrit :
>>
>>> On 2013-10-11 09:35, Eric Bénard wrote:
>>>> Le Fri, 11 Oct 2013 08:52:30 -0600,
>>>> Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com> a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> On 2013-10-11 08:39, Chris Larson wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com
>>>>>> <mailto:gary@mlbassoc.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>       I'm using image_types_fsl from meta-fsl-arm and running into
>>>>>>       some issues.  If I set
>>>>>>          IMAGE_FSTYPES="tar.bz2 ext3 sdcard"
>>>>>>          IMAGE_CLASSES="image_types_fsl"
>>>>>>       I only end up with .ext3 and .sdcard images - no .tar.bz2.
>>>>>>       If I use the default
>>>>>>          IMAGE_CLASSES="image_types"
>>>>>>       then I get .tar.bz2 but no .sdcard
>>>>>>
>>>>>>       How can I have them all at once?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Note that IMAGE_CLASSES is plural, not singular :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> IMAGE_CLASSES = "image_types image_types_fsl", presumably.
>>>>>
>>>>> When I tried that, I got the same results as just
>>>>> IMAGE_CLASSES="image_types"
>>>>> Also, meta-fsl-arm/classes/image_types_fsl.bbclass inherits
>>>>> "image_types" so
>>>>> I don't think it should be necessary to list them both.
>>>>>
>>>> don't you have a IMAGE_FSTYPES="ext3 sdcard" hardcoded somewhere in
>>>> your machine file ?
>>>
>>> No, as seen above, IMAGE_FSTYPES="tar.bz2 ext3 sdcard"
>>>
>> bitbake yourimage -e may help to understand how IMAGE_FSTYPES is built.
>
> I had already done this - that's where the quoted values are from.
> IMAGE_FSTYPES
> definitely contains all three types, but only .ext3 and .sdcard are being
> built if I use image_types_fsl.
>

Other idea for debug is the log.do_rootfs

-- 
Daiane