Re: [Suggestion] kernel/rcutorture.c: about using scnprintf() instead of sprintf().

[Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>]

On 10/13/2013 07:05 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 04:32:53PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>> Hello Maintainers:
>>
>> In srcu_torture_stats(), if cpus are more than 1K, the PAGE_SIZE will
>> not be enough.
>>
>> In rcu_torture_printk(), the 'page' maximized size is 4096, it has a
>> function pointer for printing, which not tell its maximized length.
>>
>> Welcome any additional suggestions or completions.
> 
> I never have run rcutorture on a system with that many CPUs.  ;-)
> 

I guess most of members (include me), never have run under that case.


> Given that rcutorture is not used in production, my approach would be to
> fix this when I encountered it.  But what change would you suggest, and,
> more importantly, how would you go about testing it before submitting
> a patch?
> 

OK, thanks, I will/should give a fix and test.

Hmm, In my opinion, we need:

 - let it pass LTP common simple test (so I can know how to test it).

 - intend to shrink maximized buffer (PAGE_SIZE -> 64, 256 ..) for test.

 - read your original mail again (about testing contents) as reference.

Excuse me, I have to do some other things of company, so I will/should
try to finish it within this week (2013-10-20), if this time point is
not quite suitable, please let me know, thanks.


> Or if you are simply reporting this as a bug, please let me know that.
> 

I will/should do: in q4 of 2013, I will/should spend part of my time
resources on testing.



Welcome any additional suggestions or completions.

Thanks.
-- 
Chen Gang