From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Equivalent of vmware SIOC (Storage IO Control) in KVM
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 09:49:38 +0200
Message-ID: <525BA212.5030301@redhat.com>
References: <B7C251DC5B8298499A5BF096A34CCA4E0B276C1B@xmb-aln-x14.cisco.com> <525A9F87.4020107@redhat.com> <CABYiri8kPmcdLHobOkTHCsEtH5=Ad1Zt4-Edj7DcnsOjQPbhBQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "Soumendu Satapathy (sosatapa)" <sosatapa@cisco.com>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
To: Andrey Korolyov <andrey@xdel.ru>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34942 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752724Ab3JNHto (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 14 Oct 2013 03:49:44 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CABYiri8kPmcdLHobOkTHCsEtH5=Ad1Zt4-Edj7DcnsOjQPbhBQ@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Il 14/10/2013 00:13, Andrey Korolyov ha scritto:
> Hello,
> 
> By the way, is there plans to enhance qemu I/O throttling to able to
> swallow peaks or to apply various disciplines? Current one-second flat
> discipline seemingly is not enough for uneven workloads especially
> when there is no alternative like cgroups for nbd usage.

As Fam said, QEMU 1.7 will support burst throttling.  I'm not sure what
the plans are for adding support to libvirt.

Paolo