From: Timo Mueller <mail@timomueller.eu>
To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Bluetooth: Set ISOC altsetting from within notify callback
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:20:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <525BB77A.7030803@timomueller.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DC0E2A8A-DF32-4E70-ACF4-B203D17057B9@holtmann.org>
Hi Marcel,
Am 11.10.2013 14:36, schrieb Marcel Holtmann:
> Hi Timo,
>
>>> Since the event handling is done within a workqueue, the notify
>>> callback can now sleep. So no need to trigger a separate workqueue
>>> from within the Bluetooth USB driver.
>>>
>>> This should give a little bit better latency with the SCO packet
>>> processing since the ISOC altsetting is correct from the beginning.
>>>
>>> However I am not sure if we can actually sleep in the USB reset
>>> handler and what we need to do to restore the correct altsetting
>>> in there. This could potentially fail, so please test ;)
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c | 34 ++++++++++++++--------------------
>>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
>>> index f3dfc0a..32cae73 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
>>> @@ -245,7 +245,6 @@ struct btusb_data {
>>>
>>> unsigned long flags;
>>>
>>> - struct work_struct work;
>>> struct work_struct waker;
>>>
>>> struct usb_anchor tx_anchor;
>>> @@ -685,7 +684,6 @@ static int btusb_close(struct hci_dev *hdev)
>>> if (!test_and_clear_bit(HCI_RUNNING, &hdev->flags))
>>> return 0;
>>>
>>> - cancel_work_sync(&data->work);
>>> cancel_work_sync(&data->waker);
>>>
>>> clear_bit(BTUSB_ISOC_RUNNING, &data->flags);
>>> @@ -827,18 +825,6 @@ done:
>>> return err;
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static void btusb_notify(struct hci_dev *hdev, unsigned int evt)
>>> -{
>>> - struct btusb_data *data = hci_get_drvdata(hdev);
>>> -
>>> - BT_DBG("%s evt %d", hdev->name, evt);
>>> -
>>> - if (hdev->conn_hash.sco_num != data->sco_num) {
>>> - data->sco_num = hdev->conn_hash.sco_num;
>>> - schedule_work(&data->work);
>>> - }
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> static inline int __set_isoc_interface(struct hci_dev *hdev, int altsetting)
>>> {
>>> struct btusb_data *data = hci_get_drvdata(hdev);
>>> @@ -882,9 +868,8 @@ static inline int __set_isoc_interface(struct hci_dev *hdev, int altsetting)
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static void btusb_work(struct work_struct *work)
>>> +static void btusb_update_isoc_altsetting(struct btusb_data *data)
>>> {
>>> - struct btusb_data *data = container_of(work, struct btusb_data, work);
>>> struct hci_dev *hdev = data->hdev;
>>> int new_alts;
>>> int err;
>>> @@ -932,6 +917,18 @@ static void btusb_work(struct work_struct *work)
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static void btusb_notify(struct hci_dev *hdev, unsigned int evt)
>>> +{
>>> + struct btusb_data *data = hci_get_drvdata(hdev);
>>> +
>>> + BT_DBG("%s evt %d", hdev->name, evt);
>>> +
>>> + if (hdev->conn_hash.sco_num != data->sco_num) {
>>> + data->sco_num = hdev->conn_hash.sco_num;
>>> + btusb_update_isoc_altsetting(data);
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static void btusb_waker(struct work_struct *work)
>>> {
>>> struct btusb_data *data = container_of(work, struct btusb_data, waker);
>>> @@ -1404,7 +1401,6 @@ static int btusb_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
>>>
>>> spin_lock_init(&data->lock);
>>>
>>> - INIT_WORK(&data->work, btusb_work);
>>> INIT_WORK(&data->waker, btusb_waker);
>>> spin_lock_init(&data->txlock);
>>>
>>> @@ -1540,8 +1536,6 @@ static int btusb_suspend(struct usb_interface *intf, pm_message_t message)
>>> return -EBUSY;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - cancel_work_sync(&data->work);
>>> -
>>> btusb_stop_traffic(data);
>>> usb_kill_anchored_urbs(&data->tx_anchor);
>>>
>>> @@ -1606,8 +1600,8 @@ static int btusb_resume(struct usb_interface *intf)
>>> play_deferred(data);
>>> clear_bit(BTUSB_SUSPENDING, &data->flags);
>>> spin_unlock_irq(&data->txlock);
>>> - schedule_work(&data->work);
>>>
>>> + btusb_update_isoc_altsetting(data);
>>> return 0;
>>>
>>> failed:
>>>
>> I have been testing this patch for the last two days at the UPF in Vienna. It was running fine most of the time, but I experienced two crashes. Both crashes appeared when there was an active call and the phone transferred audio to the phone and back. Both times I wasn't able to reproduce, when I restarted everything and tested again it worked fine.
>>
>> Unfortunately the kernel log is not complete but, when it failed the kernel reported:
>> [147.344546] Bluetooth: hci0 SCO packet for unknown connection handle 5
>> [147.354515] Bluetooth: hci0 SCO packet for unknown connection handle 21
>> [147.354537] Bluetooth: hci0 SCO packet for unknown connection handle 29
>> [147.354548] Bluetooth: hci0 SCO packet for unknown connection handle 65534
>> [147.364574] Bluetooth: hci0 SCO packet for unknown connection handle 65532
>> [147.364581] Bluetooth: hci0 SCO packet for unknown connection handle 27
>> …
> what kind of hardware where you testing with?
It was nothing special, an off-the-shelf CSR USB BT Dongle.
>
> This handle mismatch normally means that our SCO packet frames are out of sync. I think we are not doing a good job trying to keep them nicely lined up.
>
> For the crash, do you happen to have a backtrace of the crash. Personally I was worried about the reset handling and not the actual alternate setting switching.
Unfortunately I haven't. To be precise the first crash wasn't even a
crash, as everything was continuing to run, but without a working audio
of course. The second time my system completely froze, but due to my
fault I wasn't able to pull the backtrace. I'll see if I can reproduce
this week and send a backtrace if I manage to.
>
> Regards
>
> Marcel
Regards,
Timo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-14 9:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-05 5:51 [RFC] Bluetooth: Set ISOC altsetting from within notify callback Marcel Holtmann
2013-10-11 12:13 ` Timo Müller
2013-10-11 12:36 ` Marcel Holtmann
2013-10-14 9:20 ` Timo Mueller [this message]
2013-10-29 12:39 ` Timo Müller
2013-10-29 12:53 ` Marcel Holtmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=525BB77A.7030803@timomueller.eu \
--to=mail@timomueller.eu \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.