From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/16] xen/events: refactor
	retrigger_dynirq() and resend_irq_on_evtchn()
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 17:35:02 +0100
Message-ID: <525C1D36.4000402@citrix.com>
References: <1381236555-27493-1-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com>
	<1381236555-27493-2-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com>
	<525C14F1.3080802@oracle.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <525C14F1.3080802@oracle.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 14/10/13 16:59, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 10/08/2013 08:49 AM, David Vrabel wrote:
>> From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
>>
>> These two function did the same thing with different parameters, put
>> the common bits in retrigger_evtchn().
>>
>> This changes the return value of resend_irq_on_evtchn() but the only
>> caller (in arch/ia64/xen/irq_xen.c) ignored the return value so this
>> is fine.
> 
> Not directly related to this patch, but why do we still have
> arch/ia64/xen? Is anyone testing it? I only see a few superficial
> changes in the log for last year, and those appear to be result of code
> inspection or some global changes, not actual execution.

I was going to bring it up at the Developer's meeting.  I think we
should think about removing it.

David