All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Floris Van den Abeele <floris.vandenabeele@intec.ugent.be>
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Lower throughput in Ad-hoc than in Infrastructure mode?
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 09:28:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <525CEE98.3010300@intec.ugent.be> (raw)

While running throughput experiments using iperf I noticed that UDP
throughput in ad-hoc mode was considerably lower than in Infrastructure
mode. The setups I'm comparing is a 802.11a ad-hoc network consisting of
two clients vs a 802.11a infrastructure network consisting of an access
point and a client (11a because the tests were run in the 5GHz band).

For ad-hoc mode I'm consistenly seeing a lower throughput than for
infrastructure mode: i.e. 22.4 Mbits/sec vs 28.2 Mbits/sec. Note that
while sniffing the medium radiotap headers report a PHY data rate of
54Mbit/s in both cases. There is no other traffic on the Wi-Fi channel
in question (44). Considering the medium access for both setups is
similair I would expect to find similair throughputs. Is this a known
issue with the linux wireless/mac80211/ath9k driver stack or is this
behaviour conform the 802.11 standard (based on my knowledge I would say
no to the latter)? My test specs are below.

For testing I'm using Sparklan WPEA-111N NIC's (AR9280). The nodes are
running OpenWrt attitude adjusment on r32482 (from 2012-06-21) with the
REGD patch enabled. I believe that this build of OpenWRT uses the
compat-wireless-2012-06-14.tar.bz2 drivers.

Kind regards,
Floris

-- 
Floris Van den Abeele
Department of Information Technology
Internet Based Communication Networks and Services (IBCN)
Ghent University - iMinds
Gaston Crommenlaan 8 (Bus 201), B-9050 Gent, Belgium
M: +32 (0)494 24 92 76
E: floris.vandenabeele@intec.UGent.be
W : www.ibcn.intec.UGent.be


             reply	other threads:[~2013-10-15  7:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-15  7:28 Floris Van den Abeele [this message]
2013-10-15 13:29 ` Lower throughput in Ad-hoc than in Infrastructure mode? Felix Fietkau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=525CEE98.3010300@intec.ugent.be \
    --to=floris.vandenabeele@intec.ugent.be \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.