From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ramsay Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] miscellaneous patches Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 15:41:54 +0100 Message-ID: <525D5432.2010802@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> References: <5251CC66.30004@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> <20131014232510.GZ9464@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: GIT Mailing-list To: Jonathan Nieder X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Oct 15 16:42:03 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VW5ow-0004zH-JC for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 16:42:02 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932228Ab3JOOl6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Oct 2013 10:41:58 -0400 Received: from mdfmta009.mxout.tbr.inty.net ([91.221.168.50]:56585 "EHLO smtp.demon.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759371Ab3JOOl6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Oct 2013 10:41:58 -0400 Received: from mdfmta009.tbr.inty.net (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mdfmta009.tbr.inty.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23696384088; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 15:41:56 +0100 (BST) Received: from mdfmta009.tbr.inty.net (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mdfmta009.tbr.inty.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC1ED38407C; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 15:41:55 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.254.9] (unknown [80.176.147.220]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mdfmta009.tbr.inty.net (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 15:41:55 +0100 (BST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 In-Reply-To: <20131014232510.GZ9464@google.com> X-MDF-HostID: 4 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 15/10/13 00:25, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Ramsay Jones wrote: > >> These patches don't have too much in common, hence the subject >> line, except perhaps that 4 of them fix sparse warnings. > > Thanks. These look good. > > I tweaked the descriptions a bit to focus on what sparse was warning > about instead of our having quieted sparse. :) > Yes, the subject lines are much better. Thanks! ATB, Ramsay Jones