From: Stefanita Rares Dumitrescu <katmai@keptprivate.com>
To: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@intellique.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: xfs corrupted
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 20:45:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <525D8D67.2090301@keptprivate.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131015203434.2f336fd8@galadriel.home>
That was the first thing i checked: the array was optimal, and i checked
each drive with smartctl, and they are all fine.
I left the xfs_repair on for the night, and it showed no progress. I was
actually thinking that maybe the memory is bad, so i took the server
offline this morning, and ran a memtest for 3 hours, which showed
nothing wrong with the sticks, however good news:
I was able to mount the array, but i can only read from it. Whenever i
try to write something, it just hangs right there.
I ran an xfs_repair -n on the second array, which is 18 tb in size as
opposed to the 14 tb first one, and that check completed in like 10
minutes.
I am running now xfs_repair -n on the 14 tb bad array, and it's stuck
here for about 5 hours now.
[root@kp4 ~]# umount /home
[root@kp4 ~]# xfs_repair -n /dev/sdc
Phase 1 - find and verify superblock...
Phase 2 - using internal log
- scan filesystem freespace and inode maps...
- found root inode chunk
Phase 3 - for each AG...
- scan (but don't clear) agi unlinked lists...
- process known inodes and perform inode discovery...
- agno = 0
What worries me is that i see 100 % cpu usage, some 74 % memory usage (i
have 4 gb ram) but there is no disk activity at all. I was thinking that
it would be at least some reads if the xfs_repair is doing something.
On 15/10/2013 20:34, Emmanuel Florac wrote:
> Le Tue, 15 Oct 2013 01:41:47 -0700 (PDT) vous écriviez:
>
>> Did i jump the gun by using the -L switch :/ ?
>
> You should have checked that the RAID is optimal first! In case of a
> flailing hardware, any write to the volume can exacerbate problems.
>
> You should use arcconf to check for the RAID state (arcconf getstatus
> 1) and eventually run a RAID repair (arcconf task start 1 logicaldrive
> 0 verify_fix).
>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-15 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-15 8:41 xfs corrupted katmai
2013-10-15 18:34 ` Emmanuel Florac
2013-10-15 18:45 ` Stefanita Rares Dumitrescu [this message]
2013-10-15 19:07 ` Chris Murphy
2013-10-15 19:52 ` Emmanuel Florac
2013-10-15 19:34 ` Emmanuel Florac
2013-10-15 19:57 ` Stefanita Rares Dumitrescu
2013-10-15 20:05 ` Emmanuel Florac
2013-10-15 20:17 ` Stefanita Rares Dumitrescu
2013-10-15 20:18 ` Stefanita Rares Dumitrescu
2013-10-15 20:26 ` Dave Chinner
2013-10-16 12:23 ` Stefanita Rares Dumitrescu
2013-10-16 13:32 ` Stefanita Rares Dumitrescu
2013-10-16 17:33 ` Keith Keller
2013-10-16 22:16 ` Dave Chinner
2013-10-16 14:32 ` Stefanita Rares Dumitrescu
2013-10-16 20:52 ` Stefanita Rares Dumitrescu
2013-10-17 18:04 ` Stefanita Rares Dumitrescu
2013-10-15 20:02 ` Stefanita Rares Dumitrescu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=525D8D67.2090301@keptprivate.com \
--to=katmai@keptprivate.com \
--cc=eflorac@intellique.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.