From: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] Bumping packages: some comments/suggestions
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 21:55:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <525D9DBE.7040802@mind.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131015093444.4ef3fa17@skate>
On 15/10/13 09:34, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Dear Arnout Vandecappelle,
>
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 23:55:17 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
>
>>> What I wanted to add in this discussion is this: if there are people
>>> out there that have time for some buildroot development but they have
>>> no clear goal of their own, they can among others choose between
>>> package bumps and fixing autobuild failures.
>>> While there certainly is value in package bumping, I hope that not all
>>> of these people jump onto the bump-train and instead help with the
>>> autobuild failures. We still hope to get to 0 failures at some point,
>>> and bumping packages all the time will most of the time only add new
>>> problems.
>>
>> I'm also not too hot on version bumping just for the sake of bumping.
>> Version bumps should be done when they're useful for someone, e.g.
>> because a feature or bugfix is added. If it's useful to you, then you'll
>> obviously test if it still works correctly.
>
> I understand this point of view, but on the other hand, it's not really
> nice to have packages that have very old versions. For "core" stuff
> that isn't necessarily very easy to bump (think Qt, Gtk, X.org and
> things like that), it's quite important that the core Buildroot
> community keeps that up to date, because this is difficult to do for
> newcomers, and this is what people will look at to see if Buildroot is
> well-maintained and active.
Yes of course. The version detection idea is certainly useful. I just
wanted to concur with Thomas DS that this shouldn't distract people from
fixing autobuilder failures.
Regards,
Arnout
--
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-15 19:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-13 9:42 [Buildroot] Bumping packages: some comments/suggestions Thomas Petazzoni
2013-10-13 10:44 ` Axel Lin
2013-10-13 13:42 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-10-13 15:01 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-10-13 15:06 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-10-13 21:04 ` Jerzy Grzegorek
2013-10-14 7:09 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-10-14 7:40 ` Jeremy Rosen
2013-10-14 9:30 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-10-14 9:38 ` Jeremy Rosen
2013-10-14 10:02 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-10-14 10:04 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-10-14 12:58 ` arnaud aujon
2013-10-14 13:56 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-10-14 17:11 ` arnaud aujon
2013-10-14 21:55 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-10-15 7:34 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-10-15 19:55 ` Arnout Vandecappelle [this message]
2013-10-14 13:45 ` rjbarnet at rockwellcollins.com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=525D9DBE.7040802@mind.be \
--to=arnout@mind.be \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.