From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: acme@ghostprotocols.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf record: mmap output file - v2
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 19:58:34 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <525DF2CA.1060102@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87haci9e31.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
On 10/15/13 7:52 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Aha, okay. So it mostly matters to syscall tracing, right? For a
> normal record session, it seems that the effect is not that large:
Yes, that's in the description "When recording raw_syscalls for the
entire system"
There is a small benefit to all record sessions -- mmap+memcpy has less
overhead than write(). I still need to look at Ingo's suggestion to use
non-temporal stores which might reduce the overhead of the memcpy.
Try a workload that generates a HUGE data file -- say a full kernel
build (e.g., perf record -g -- make O=/tmp/kbuild -j 16). You should see
a much larger benefit from the mmap route. Be sure to use your callchain
enhancements to look at that 1+G file. ;-)
David
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-16 1:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-15 2:55 [PATCH] perf record: mmap output file - v2 David Ahern
2013-10-15 6:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-15 7:09 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-10-15 7:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-15 8:17 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-10-15 12:22 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-10-15 13:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-15 13:25 ` David Ahern
2013-10-16 1:24 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-10-15 7:31 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-10-15 7:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-15 13:45 ` David Ahern
2013-10-15 13:35 ` David Ahern
2013-10-16 1:52 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-10-16 1:58 ` David Ahern [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=525DF2CA.1060102@gmail.com \
--to=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.