From: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] About user support and the mailing list
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 23:56:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <525F0B82.1050709@mind.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAXf6LXtbwTCy_ZWVSsgTjefP2qrHkob0Oia2qN8fd-7sez5Ng@mail.gmail.com>
On 15/10/13 21:44, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Peter Korsgaard<jacmet@uclibc.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>>>>>"Ryan" == Ryan Barnett<rjbarnet@rockwellcollins.com> writes:
>> >
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> > >> That would separate the high traffic/fast reading parts from the
>> > >> low traffic/philosophical discussion parts.
>> >
>> > Ryan> I really like this idea as I believe it fits well with how this
>> > Ryan> FOSS project works. The majority of the emails are related to
>> > Ryan> patches and discussion surrounding them. I usually glance through
>> > Ryan> these emails since I don't necessarily have time to read through
>> > Ryan> all of the patches. So by having this separation would be nice
>> > Ryan> as that way I don't accidentally glance over a philosophical
>> > Ryan> discussion such as this.
>> >
>> >The problem is that these things are rarely nicely seperated. This
>> >thread started as a reply to a patch submission.
> This is not necessarily a big problem. If a discussion occurs on the
> 'patch' mailing list that is no longer directly related with the
> actual patch, we should at least put the 'discussion' mailing list in
> copy (or use only that list). In the beginning this can be odd, but
> it's something we can learn.
I was first against the -patch / -discuss split for the same reasons as
Peter's, but as you say, it's easy to add -discuss to a reply.
If this split goes through, I'd keep buildroot at busybox.net as the
-discuss list and create a new one for patches.
Patchwork should probably listen to both, since people will (certainly
in the beginning) still send patches to the normal list.
Regards,
Arnout
--
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-16 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-12 10:15 [Buildroot] [PATCH] package: fix 'local' site method for host packages Thomas Petazzoni
2013-10-14 19:59 ` Peter Korsgaard
2013-10-15 8:25 ` [Buildroot] About user support and the mailing list Thomas Petazzoni
2013-10-15 13:04 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-10-15 13:16 ` Jeremy Rosen
2013-10-15 14:30 ` Ryan Barnett
2013-10-15 16:07 ` Peter Korsgaard
2013-10-15 19:44 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-10-16 21:56 ` Arnout Vandecappelle [this message]
2013-10-16 16:00 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=525F0B82.1050709@mind.be \
--to=arnout@mind.be \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.