From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wei Ni Subject: Re: About [PATCH 1/2] regulator: core: Provide a dummy regulator with full constraints Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 18:39:56 +0800 Message-ID: <525FBE7C.9080402@nvidia.com> References: <5253A17E.10503@nvidia.com> <20131008090910.GW21581@sirena.org.uk> <5253D489.7010900@nvidia.com> <20131012121412.GJ2443@sirena.org.uk> <525E17DE.6080301@nvidia.com> <20131016103942.GG2443@sirena.org.uk> <525F6A1B.70505@nvidia.com> <20131017093701.GH2443@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20131017093701.GH2443-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Mark Brown Cc: "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org" , "linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On 10/17/2013 05:37 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > * PGP Signed by an unknown key > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:39:55PM +0800, Wei Ni wrote: > >> So do you mean it should call the regulator_has_full_constraints() in >> the .init_machine for all machines? If so, this will affect all boards, >> for example, in arch/arm/mach-tegra, if we set full constraints in the >> shared board file tegra.c, all tegra boards will be set, is it right? > > Yes, but this is currently the case anyway for every system using DT - > all we'd be doing is moving this call earlier in init. Ok, I will send out patches for Tegra series. > > * Unknown Key > * 0x7EA229BD > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754659Ab3JQKkE (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Oct 2013 06:40:04 -0400 Received: from hqemgate16.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.65]:10510 "EHLO hqemgate16.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753156Ab3JQKkB (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Oct 2013 06:40:01 -0400 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by hqnvupgp08.nvidia.com on Thu, 17 Oct 2013 03:35:33 -0700 Message-ID: <525FBE7C.9080402@nvidia.com> Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 18:39:56 +0800 From: Wei Ni User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Brown CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "swarren@wwwdotorg.org" , "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: About [PATCH 1/2] regulator: core: Provide a dummy regulator with full constraints References: <5253A17E.10503@nvidia.com> <20131008090910.GW21581@sirena.org.uk> <5253D489.7010900@nvidia.com> <20131012121412.GJ2443@sirena.org.uk> <525E17DE.6080301@nvidia.com> <20131016103942.GG2443@sirena.org.uk> <525F6A1B.70505@nvidia.com> <20131017093701.GH2443@sirena.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20131017093701.GH2443@sirena.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/17/2013 05:37 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > * PGP Signed by an unknown key > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:39:55PM +0800, Wei Ni wrote: > >> So do you mean it should call the regulator_has_full_constraints() in >> the .init_machine for all machines? If so, this will affect all boards, >> for example, in arch/arm/mach-tegra, if we set full constraints in the >> shared board file tegra.c, all tegra boards will be set, is it right? > > Yes, but this is currently the case anyway for every system using DT - > all we'd be doing is moving this call earlier in init. Ok, I will send out patches for Tegra series. > > * Unknown Key > * 0x7EA229BD >