From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
To: Krzysztof Mazur <krzysiek@podlesie.net>,
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Cc: John Szakmeister <john@szakmeister.net>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Add core.mode configuration
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 14:31:19 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <525ee9872ab50_3983c19e7c27@nysa.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131016070900.GC24964@shrek.podlesie.net>
Krzysztof Mazur wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:55:07PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > John Szakmeister wrote:
> > >
> > > I like the idea that we could kick git into a mode that applies the
> > > behaviors we're talking about having in 2.0, but I'm concerned about
> > > one aspect of it. Not having these behaviors until 2.0 hits means
> > > we're free to renege on our decisions in favor of something better, or
> > > to pull out a bad idea. But once we insert this knob, I don't know
> > > that we have the same ability. Once people realize it's there and
> > > start using it, it gets harder to back out. I guess we could maintain
> > > the stance that "the features are not concrete yet," or something like
> > > that, but I think people would still get upset if something changes
> > > out from under them.
> >
> > We cannot change the behavior of push.default = simple already, so at least
> > that option is not in question.
>
> If we add core.addremove=true the same applies to it - we cannot remove
> it later, the only we can do is to disable it by default in future
> versions after testing (core.addremove=true or core.mode=next).
That is true, but adding core.addremove = true would probably imply there's the
option of adding core.addremove = false.
> > > So, at the end of the day, I'm just not sure it's worthwhile to have.
> >
> > This is exactly what happened on 1.6; nobody really tested the 'git foo'
> > behavior, so we just switched from one version to the next. If you are not
> > familiar with the outcome; it wasn't good.
>
> BTW, I'm still using pre-1.6 git-foo, I have /usr/libexec/git-core
> in my PATH. So I would like to always have an option to disable some
> new incompatible "improvements".
That's what core.addremove = false would do, wouldn't it?
> > So I say we shouldn't just provide warnings, but also have an option to allow
> > users (probably a minority) to start testing this.
> >
>
> and an option to keep the old behavior, like we did with push.default.
Ditto.
--
Felipe Contreras
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-16 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-12 7:04 [PATCH v3] Add core.mode configuration Felipe Contreras
2013-10-14 20:59 ` Krzysztof Mazur
2013-10-14 21:35 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-10-15 12:35 ` Krzysztof Mazur
2013-10-15 12:32 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-10-15 13:33 ` Krzysztof Mazur
2013-10-15 13:29 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-10-15 14:51 ` Krzysztof Mazur
2013-10-15 16:59 ` John Szakmeister
2013-10-16 3:55 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-10-16 7:09 ` Krzysztof Mazur
2013-10-16 19:31 ` Felipe Contreras [this message]
2013-10-16 10:54 ` John Szakmeister
2013-10-16 15:11 ` John Szakmeister
2013-10-16 19:57 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-10-16 19:32 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-10-16 22:02 ` Philip Oakley
2013-10-16 23:06 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-10-17 19:48 ` Philip Oakley
2013-10-17 21:08 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-10-15 18:51 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-10-15 22:01 ` Krzysztof Mazur
2013-10-16 4:03 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-10-16 6:34 ` Krzysztof Mazur
2013-10-16 19:28 ` Felipe Contreras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=525ee9872ab50_3983c19e7c27@nysa.notmuch \
--to=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=john@szakmeister.net \
--cc=krzysiek@podlesie.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.