All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: jianhai luan <jianhai.luan@oracle.com>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
	<ian.campbell@citrix.com>, <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	<annie.li@oracle.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net] xen-netback: add the scenario which now beyond the range time_after_eq().
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 16:25:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5260015C.2030100@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <526000F5.1090102@oracle.com>

On 17/10/13 16:23, jianhai luan wrote:
> 
> On 2013-10-17 22:06, Wei Liu wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 09:59:30PM +0800, jianhai luan wrote:
>> [...]
>>>>>>> If use time_after_eq64(), expire ,next_credit and other member
>>>>>>> will must
>>>>>>> be u64.
>>>>>> Yes, you'll need to store next_credit as a u64 in vif instead of
>>>>>> calculating it in tx_credit_exceeded from expires (which is only an
>>>>>> unsigned long).
>>>>> I know that.  Even we use u64, time_after_eq()  will also do wrong
>>>>> judge
>>>>> in theory (not in reality because need long long time).
>>>> If jiffies_64 has millisecond resolution that would be more than
>>>> 500,000,000 years.
>>> Yes, I agree the fact.
>>>>> I think the two better fixed way is below:
>>>>>    - By time_before() to judge if now beyond MAX_ULONG/2
>>>> This is broken, so no.
>>> Where is broken?  would you like to help me point it out.
>> I think David means you didn't actually fix the problem. Your solution is
>> merely a workaround.
> 
> I have think  about using u64, but more code need to be modified and
> that is not all.  Key point is how to change the element of struct
> time_list (expires)  and don't affect other thing?

I already suggested a way that didn't require changing the timer
structure -- calculate and store next_credit in advanced.

David

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-17 15:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-16 17:22 [PATCH net] xen-netback: add the scenario which now beyond the range time_after_eq() Jason Luan
2013-10-17  8:26 ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-17  8:26 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2013-10-17  9:02   ` jianhai luan
2013-10-17  9:04     ` jianhai luan
2013-10-17  9:04     ` [Xen-devel] " jianhai luan
2013-10-17  9:15     ` David Vrabel
2013-10-17  9:15     ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2013-10-17 10:19       ` jianhai luan
2013-10-17 10:31         ` David Vrabel
2013-10-17 10:31         ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2013-10-17 13:59           ` jianhai luan
2013-10-17 14:06             ` Wei Liu
2013-10-17 15:23               ` jianhai luan
2013-10-17 15:23               ` [Xen-devel] " jianhai luan
2013-10-17 15:25                 ` David Vrabel [this message]
2013-10-17 15:41                   ` jianhai luan
2013-10-18  6:48                     ` annie li
2013-10-18  6:48                     ` [Xen-devel] " annie li
2013-10-17 15:41                   ` jianhai luan
2013-10-17 15:25                 ` David Vrabel
2013-10-17 14:06             ` Wei Liu
2013-10-17 13:59           ` jianhai luan
2013-10-17 10:19       ` jianhai luan
2013-10-17  9:26     ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-17  9:26     ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2013-10-17  9:59       ` jianhai luan
2013-10-17  9:59       ` [Xen-devel] " jianhai luan
2013-10-17 16:38       ` annie li
2013-10-17 16:41         ` Wei Liu
2013-10-17 16:41         ` [Xen-devel] " Wei Liu
2013-10-18  1:59           ` annie li
2013-10-18  1:59           ` [Xen-devel] " annie li
2013-10-18  7:43         ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-18  8:14           ` annie li
2013-10-18  8:26             ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-18  8:40               ` David Laight
2013-10-18  8:40               ` [Xen-devel] " David Laight
2013-10-18 11:24                 ` Wei Liu
2013-10-18 11:24                 ` [Xen-devel] " Wei Liu
2013-10-23  8:02                   ` jianhai luan
2013-10-23 16:07                     ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-23 16:07                     ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2013-10-24 10:04                       ` David Laight
2013-10-24 10:04                       ` David Laight
2013-10-24 11:34                       ` [Xen-devel] " jianhai luan
2013-10-24 11:34                       ` jianhai luan
2013-10-23  8:02                   ` jianhai luan
2013-10-18  8:55               ` annie li
2013-10-18  8:55               ` [Xen-devel] " annie li
2013-10-18  8:26             ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-18  8:14           ` annie li
2013-10-18  7:43         ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-17 16:38       ` annie li
2013-10-17  9:02   ` jianhai luan
2013-10-17 16:21   ` [Xen-devel] " annie li
2013-10-18  7:41     ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-18  7:41     ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2013-10-17 16:21   ` annie li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5260015C.2030100@citrix.com \
    --to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=annie.li@oracle.com \
    --cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=jianhai.luan@oracle.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.