From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Danny Al-Gaaf <danny.al-gaaf@bisect.de>
Subject: Re: Ceph puppet module
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 00:15:51 +0200
Message-ID: <52606197.4030702@bisect.de>
References: <525E47AA.8060006@dachary.org>	<CABZ+qqmxKFeEDfiCu8i1_sn9TZCD4_-p8+2+XFaj=+kQq_Jnvw@mail.gmail.com> <CACEfbZghTwxVAhVv4=gUbPffj3CyrNh5rXjZVPHsKMJuLUoH=A@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: Danny Al-Gaaf <danny.al-gaaf@bisect.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from wp188.webpack.hosteurope.de ([80.237.132.195]:36409 "EHLO
	wp188.webpack.hosteurope.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757974Ab3JQWPx (ORCPT
	<rfc822;ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 17 Oct 2013 18:15:53 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CACEfbZghTwxVAhVv4=gUbPffj3CyrNh5rXjZVPHsKMJuLUoH=A@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <ceph-devel.vger.kernel.org>
To: Ceph Development <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Woodward <xarses@gmail.com>

Am 17.10.2013 22:29, schrieb Andrew Woodward:
> We need to have a reasonable license on this preferably Apache 2.0.
> the enovance module is AGPL which can't come in contact with nearly
> anything with out causing massive license issues. Starting with any of
> the enovance code is a Non-starter as it will require the AGPL
> License.

I agree with the Apache license.

Would it be an option to ask enovance (and the contributers) to
relicense under Apache v2.0? I would be happy to do that for my
contributions.

Danny