From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55595)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1VX3fx-0004d7-Fl
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 02:36:54 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1VX3fp-00061Q-2t
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 02:36:45 -0400
Received: from mail-ee0-x231.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c00::231]:56314)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1VX3fo-00061A-RM
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 02:36:37 -0400
Received: by mail-ee0-f49.google.com with SMTP id d41so1667009eek.36
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 23:36:35 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5260D6ED.5090704@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 08:36:29 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1382046646-20263-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
	<1382046646-20263-2-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
	<87k3hbcfhz.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
In-Reply-To: <87k3hbcfhz.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] acpi-test: basic acpi unit-test
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>

Il 18/10/2013 07:30, Markus Armbruster ha scritto:
> > +static void test_acpi_tcg(void)
> > +{
> > +    test_acpi_one("-machine accel=tcg");
> > +}
> 
> Since qtest_init() adds your parameters at the end, this should result
> in a command line ending with "-machine accel=qtest -machine accel=tcg",
> which should result in qtest.  How does this work?

The last option wins.

Paolo