From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Opdenacker Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] init: make init failures more explicit Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 15:03:52 +0200 Message-ID: <526131B8.5030207@free-electrons.com> References: <1382097633-10166-1-git-send-email-michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-embedded-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Andrew Morton , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Embedded , janne.karhunen@gmail.com On 10/18/2013 02:20 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Michael Opdenacker > wrote: >> + pr_err("Starting init: %s exists but couldn't execute it (error: %d - see errno-base.h and errno.h)\n", > IMHO the "- see errno-base.h and errno.h" is a bit overkill. Yes, I was wondering. Good to have your opinion on this! I'll post an update with just the error number, also adding the error code to the other two "Failed to execute" error messages. Thanks! Michael. -- Michael Opdenacker, CEO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com +33 484 258 098