From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremie Samuel Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] sdhci: Move real work out of an atomic context Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 17:52:56 +0200 Message-ID: <52654DD8.1090806@parrot.com> References: <1382369157-16129-1-git-send-email-jeremie.samuel.ext@parrot.com> <86hacaprmz.fsf@void.printf.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from co202.xi-lite.net ([149.6.83.202]:37382 "EHLO co202.xi-lite.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753432Ab3JUPyT (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Oct 2013 11:54:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: <86hacaprmz.fsf@void.printf.net> Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Chris Ball Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gr=E9gor_Boirie?= , Matthieu Castet v2: Patches on sdhci-bcm-kona.c, sdhci-dove.c, sdhci-s3c.c, sdhci-sirf.c, sdhci-spear.c in order to consider the change tasklet -> workqueue Version of 16 oct 13: Patches on sdhci-esdhc-imx.c, sdhci-pxav3.c, sdhci-s3c.c in order to consider the change spinlock -> mutex Version of 06 jul 13: Resend in order to include the patches in kernel 3.12 Version of 24 may 13: First version of my patches (based on Anton Vorontsov's patches http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mmc/2579) Sorry for the issues. It's my first submission on a Linux mailing list. Cordially, -- Jeremie Samuel Parrot S.A. Software Engineer 14, quai de Jemmapes R&D/OS Platform 75010 Paris, France http://www.parrot.com On 21/10/2013 17:31, Chris Ball wrote: > Hi Jeremie, > > On Mon, Oct 21 2013, Jeremie Samuel wrote: >> Currently the sdhci driver does everything in the atomic context. >> And what is worse, PIO transfers are made from the IRQ handler. >> >> Some patches were already submitted to solve this issue. But there were >> rejected because they involved new issues. >> >> This set of patches is an evolution of an old patch from Anton Vorontsov. >> I tried to fix all the problems involved by the patches. I tested it for >> several time now with SD cards and SDIO. >> >> So, this patch set reworks sdhci code to avoid atomic context, >> almost completely. > Could we get a changelog from patchset v1 to v2, for the record? > (And isn't this more like v4 of your series?) > > You don't have to resend the patchset, just replying with the > changelog here is fine. > > Thanks! > > - Chris.