From: Fernando Pizarro <feanpg@gmail.com>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
<b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Originators with cero TQ
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 18:37:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52655830.8080607@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131021131745.GB1544@neomailbox.net>
El 21/10/13 15:17, Antonio Quartulli escribió:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 01:23:37PM +0100, Bruno Alexandre Taraio dos Santos Antunes wrote:
>> I think its spanish for zero
> In that case..If I remember correctly you can have TQ=0 only for "Potential
> Netxthops". If an originator has a TQ=0 on the best path then it is should not
> be shown in the originator table.
>
> However, if you have further doubts, please post the table.
>
> Regards,
>
Hi all,
That's correct. Nodes with cero value (TQ=0) there are in "Potential
Nexthops" but there are a lot of them in the originator table. In some
cases, only there is one node with TQ major than 0. Example:
172.16.0.9 0.300s (196) 172.16.0.36 [ wlan1]: 172.16.0.40
( 0) 172.16.0.35 ( 0) 172.16.0.22 ( 0) 172.16.0.39
( 0) 172.16.0.33 ( 0) 172.16.0.32 ( 0) 172.16.0.36
(196)
Full table in this link: hxxp://pastebin.com/6rpieA7y
There are another cases, a behaviour that I don't understand is this:
Traffic is being routed using a SINGLE jump (or direct link) very low
bandwidth to its target, but there are many other options with better
bandwidth, however using more jumps/links, why is this happening and how
can I control it?
Number of hop are more important than link quality to calculate TQ
value? Is there any "well-known formula" to calculate TQ?
I make some tests changing default class of a client to 3 (batctl gw
client 3) with same results. What is the best client value for a large
enviroment (about 40 AP's)?
Thanks for all.
Regards, Fernando.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-21 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-21 12:05 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Originators with cero TQ Fernando Pizarro
2013-10-21 12:21 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-10-21 12:23 ` Bruno Alexandre Taraio dos Santos Antunes
2013-10-21 13:17 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-10-21 16:37 ` Fernando Pizarro [this message]
2013-10-22 6:28 ` Antonio Quartulli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52655830.8080607@gmail.com \
--to=feanpg@gmail.com \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.