From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from co1ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com ([216.32.180.187] helo=co1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1VYoAD-0001mT-R1 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 02:27:15 +0000 Message-ID: <52673487.40908@freescale.com> Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 10:29:27 +0800 From: Huang Shijie MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brian Norris Subject: Re: [PATCH for mtd-utils 0/4] about the SLC/MLC References: <1376978317-28010-1-git-send-email-b32955@freescale.com> <20131022233349.GR23337@ld-irv-0074.broadcom.com> In-Reply-To: <20131022233349.GR23337@ld-irv-0074.broadcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, dwmw2@infradead.org, dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , =E4=BA=8E 2013=E5=B9=B410=E6=9C=8823=E6=97=A5 07:33, Brian Norris =E5=86=99= =E9=81=93: > You're missing flash_erase.c, which still has: > > isNAND =3D mtd.type =3D=3D MTD_NANDFLASH ? 1 : 0; I missed it on purpose. The "isNAND" is used for the jffs2 to write the cleanmarker. Since the jffs2 does not support the MLC now, the above line is used to=20 check the SLC nand now. Only the SLC nand can be written with the cleanmarker. Am i right? thanks Huang Shijie