From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.webfaction.com (mail6.webfaction.com [74.55.86.74]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD270E0174C for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 19:34:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (c-68-38-40-177.hsd1.nj.comcast.net [68.38.40.177]) by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BE832262908; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 02:34:38 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <526735B9.1020402@mindchasers.com> Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 22:34:33 -0400 From: Bob Cochran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Otavio Salvador References: <52601DC0.7080707@mindchasers.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: Looking for recommendations to help evaluate Freescale LS1021A... X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 02:34:41 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > For i.MX we have many supported boards; you can see the full list at > our Release Notes[1]. > > 1. http://freescale.github.io/doc/release-notes/1.5/ Thanks Otavio. I'm leaning towards the sabre-lite design. Could someone please clarify whether there are any notable differences / advantages when comparing the Boundary and Element14 boards? I see from the jpegs of the two boards that they are very similar and are both built from a Freescale sabre lite reference. Are the only differences the connectors and silkscreen? Bob > > The right SoC is very project specific so it is hard to give a good > advise; regarding possible evaluation boards you have many available > and I'd say for you to try to choose one with support on this BSP so > it easy your initial development. > > I hope this gives you some pointers where to start. > > Regards, >