From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pd0-f175.google.com (mail-pd0-f175.google.com [209.85.192.175]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4699E0174C for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 20:34:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pd0-f175.google.com with SMTP id g10so263940pdj.20 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 20:34:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=o1oWjJYhQUT7gVst7RY4T8lkx2rlmQvP/zmFAA8EwuI=; b=WS/A0zb/VaYDfPzTi0h9JReLf9c1s6JbV1GWw88KJ1ADLM7DIVdC+L0mFAYZI59rtP VC9iz8IQvtbOwl4h1KK1roV2Ws7RZ81ixBtk6VmCX8gZHoFvKczSwQpwDLTqpaz0hxeZ f5MGthfdIQ2KHqRU0Qd0kbO3n4OUw6NIcBs22mUHGiZw8jTWqf4DwPqsNrS+M0xQih1l TbkXSYPJP2fnL/DtuiB1CgoW1SZK28F44susvKcskd4zjC0rzjrFW9xMuubNBCb8NF5f UbY2N/VxtPJ3tLX6DD5JK1VGGTfiLxQNlzPkodIXLxDl28vP/c7xlth2VnRi3m0c5iIg 7jww== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQldQ9pKkCyBP2QucrkqURWqfFiDKoYWp1kykkBwvpjsGn/8OuLguUDfdQsV2y4e6fMxYPhz X-Received: by 10.66.146.170 with SMTP id td10mr926612pab.161.1382499282976; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 20:34:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.8] (ip98-167-230-131.ph.ph.cox.net. [98.167.230.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id rp8sm1139675pbc.25.2013.10.22.20.34.40 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 22 Oct 2013 20:34:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <526743CF.5040909@boundarydevices.com> Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 20:34:39 -0700 From: Eric Nelson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Otavio Salvador , Bob Cochran References: <52601DC0.7080707@mindchasers.com> <526735B9.1020402@mindchasers.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: Looking for recommendations to help evaluate Freescale LS1021A... X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 03:34:47 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/22/2013 07:51 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:34 AM, Bob Cochran wrote: >>> >>> For i.MX we have many supported boards; you can see the full list at >>> our Release Notes[1]. >>> >>> 1. http://freescale.github.io/doc/release-notes/1.5/ >> >> >> Thanks Otavio. I'm leaning towards the sabre-lite design. Could someone >> please clarify whether there are any notable differences / advantages when >> comparing the Boundary and Element14 boards? >> >> I see from the jpegs of the two boards that they are very similar and are >> both built from a Freescale sabre lite reference. Are the only differences >> the connectors and silkscreen? > > If you plan to use a SoM, my advice is to choose a vendor which > provides SoMs with the right feature-set you need. > > I am not aware of any differences between both. Eric are you aware of any? > As much as I'd like to sell boards, I can only comment on ours (which I tend to like ;)). I also feel fairly comfortable in saying that we're a lot more active with support in the community (since I've never seen a post or code from anyone at Element14). Regards, Eric