From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pb0-f49.google.com (mail-pb0-f49.google.com [209.85.160.49]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51FB3E01754 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 10:54:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pb0-f49.google.com with SMTP id xb12so1294237pbc.36 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 10:54:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ao+FQHHCXvqmQdQvALOV7ePyHmb01u5aIoN93qGMNWw=; b=Q77JgZtiSqRvikf3jJjTebABwK/kw1j2o0bCvh4udPG+FnYBNuO2kFgsMaWwaA+gBu OEO9mi0iyA7OsPsGk6CICKzQYzBdPm/AMYpUqTVMgBdnXV+PVbyd1BJeDhxTL1Lj2FvI 0rrmqIxbBGecd/88hgmJr+xHpi3oGH5JCtJN53vwZvoW0lH91wdS4PAWX9bzt5TSHN75 cLR7Zx7AKvCvRy8N3MECmMalNTPvyzFwKR5aP6gDB5oK9cY9dWpNR2ietLaTIpXhtWe8 a5a8CTNBUh0fuE9YcEH7sCjFsL5KJ0wR1mm61WA56C0Xs1RXPHhK+kyVSmdvOG6kwCVI hmmg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn8pdPCJbc0aTuEXPuT2ytH0K1nZcKCRIDfHSjoAr5A2irmyC37v7cljrQrBTF7DzFikD3f X-Received: by 10.68.232.74 with SMTP id tm10mr2971680pbc.64.1382550842341; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 10:54:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.53] (97-117-169-108.phnx.qwest.net. [97.117.169.108]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id yg3sm42779229pab.16.2013.10.23.10.54.00 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 23 Oct 2013 10:54:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <52680D36.7060804@boundarydevices.com> Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 10:53:58 -0700 From: Eric Nelson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bob Cochran , Otavio Salvador References: <52601DC0.7080707@mindchasers.com> <526735B9.1020402@mindchasers.com> <526743CF.5040909@boundarydevices.com> <52680B72.7060503@mindchasers.com> In-Reply-To: <52680B72.7060503@mindchasers.com> Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: Looking for recommendations to help evaluate Freescale LS1021A... X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 17:54:03 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Bob, On 10/23/2013 10:46 AM, Bob Cochran wrote: > On 10/22/2013 11:34 PM, Eric Nelson wrote: >>>> Could someone >>>> please clarify whether there are any notable differences / advantages >>>> when >>>> comparing the Boundary and Element14 boards? >>>> >>>> I see from the jpegs of the two boards that they are very similar and >>>> are >>>> both built from a Freescale sabre lite reference. Are the only >>>> differences >>>> the connectors and silkscreen? >>> >>> If you plan to use a SoM, my advice is to choose a vendor which >>> provides SoMs with the right feature-set you need. >>> >>> I am not aware of any differences between both. Eric are you aware of >>> any? >>> >> >> As much as I'd like to sell boards, I can only comment on ours (which I >> tend to like ;)). > > Hi Eric, > > I'm happy to support those that support me. > > I see that the sabre-lite has been renamed. Are there multiple > revisions of the board out? If so, what is the latest? I want to make > sure a distributor doesn't sell me a stale revision. > The only revisions of the board itself are long gone (>1 year ago). There was also a change in silicon revision of the CPU (from 1.0 to 1.2) around February, but boards were back-ordered shortly after that, so I'm certain there's no stale inventory. Regards, Eric