From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.172] helo=ns3.lanforge.com) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1VZ7rP-0001mY-Mq for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 23:29:08 +0000 Message-ID: <52685BA1.5020801@candelatech.com> Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 16:28:33 -0700 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: ath10k hits warning in sta_info.c:839. References: <5266C321.7000103@candelatech.com> <5266FAAD.3010800@candelatech.com> In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Michal Kazior Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org On 10/23/2013 12:42 AM, Michal Kazior wrote: > Yup. This originates from the firmware limitation. It's unable to > handle two peer nodes with same mac addr on different vdevs. That's > why it's impossible to associate 2 (or more) station interfaces to the > same BSS. I'm hoping to fix that soon. From what I can tell, the firmware is actually crashing, not just asserting. I can find the 'program counter' in the firmware crash dump, but I am still working on how to get some sort of stack trace or source code location out of that. In case it helps someone else, I believe the register dump lines: ath10k: target Register Dump ath10k: [00]: 0x4100016C 0x00000000 0x0098B7DA 0x00000000 decode as: Target, Line (if assert), ProgramCounter(PC), bad-virtual-addr Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k