From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>, Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] iio: adc: ti_am335x_adc: do not free the kfifo twice
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 11:25:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5268E773.3020507@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5268F2C9.5010104@kernel.org>
On 10/24/2013 12:13 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On 10/23/13 18:44, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>> The code is actually fine as it is. The iio_kfifo_free() function drops a reference, but does not free the buffer's memory if somebody else is still holding a reference.
>>
>> - Lars
> I'm guessing this came from a crash though.... Sebastian, what motivated the patch?
tiadc_iio_buffered_hardware_remove() in staging-next looks like this:
static void tiadc_iio_buffered_hardware_remove(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
{
struct tiadc_device *adc_dev = iio_priv(indio_dev);
free_irq(adc_dev->mfd_tscadc->irq, indio_dev);
iio_kfifo_free(indio_dev->buffer);
iio_buffer_unregister(indio_dev);
}
and is called rmmod time. iio_kfifo_free() cleans up the buffer (there
is not a second reference so the memory is gone.
iio_buffer_unregister() crashes later because
void iio_buffer_unregister(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
{
kfree(indio_dev->buffer->scan_mask);
kfree(indio_dev->buffer->scan_el_group.attrs);
iio_free_chan_devattr_list(&indio_dev->buffer->scan_el_dev_attr_list);
}
the first kree() is looking at ->buffer which is gone by now. So at
first I changed switched the order of the two (iio_kfifi_free() and
iio_buffer_unregister()) and I had a crash later because iio_core
removes the buffer as well.
So I dropped the iio_kfifo_free() call since it seems to be already
done.
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-24 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-23 17:44 [PATCH 1/2] iio: adc: ti_am335x_adc: do not free the kfifo twice Lars-Peter Clausen
2013-10-24 10:13 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-10-24 9:25 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2013-10-24 9:41 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2013-10-24 10:34 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-10-24 10:44 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2013-10-24 10:51 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-10-24 11:50 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-11-09 12:34 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-11-10 9:37 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2013-11-10 11:31 ` Jonathan Cameron
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-10-23 17:00 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5268E773.3020507@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.